Demand and level of service inflation in Floating Catchment Area (FCA) methods.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
08
08
2018
accepted:
11
06
2019
entrez:
28
6
2019
pubmed:
28
6
2019
medline:
14
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Floating Catchment Area (FCA) methods are a popular tool to investigate accessibility to public facilities, in particular health care services. FCA approaches are attractive because, unlike other accessibility measures, they take into account the potential for congestion of facilities. This is done by 1) considering the population within the catchment area of a facility to calculate a variable that measures level of service, and then 2) aggregating the level of service by population centers subject to catchment area constraints. In this paper we discuss an effect of FCA approaches, an artifact that we term demand and level of service inflation. These artifacts are present in previous implementations of FCA methods. We argue that inflation makes interpretation of estimates of accessibility difficult, which has possible deleterious consequences for decision making. Next, we propose a simple and intuitive approach to proportionally allocate demandand and level of service in FCA calculations. The approach is based on a standardization of the impedance matrix, similar to approaches popular in the spatial statistics and econometrics literature. The result is a more intiuitive measure of accessibility that 1) provides a local version of the provider-to-population ratio; and 2) preserves the level of demand and the level of supply in a system. We illustrate the relevant issues with some examples, and then empirically by means of a case study of accessibility to family physicians in the Hamilton Census Metropolitan Area (CMA), in Ontario, Canada. Results indicate that demand and supply inflation/deflation affect the interpretation of accessibility analysis using existing FCA methods, and that the proposed adjustment can lead to more intuitive results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31246984
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218773
pii: PONE-D-18-23419
pmc: PMC6597094
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0218773Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0159148
pubmed: 27391649
J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74(367):519-30
pubmed: 12310706
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 8;12(2):e0171747
pubmed: 28178335
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 19;8(7):e70227
pubmed: 23894622
Health Place. 2009 Dec;15(4):1100-7
pubmed: 19576837
Health Place. 2013 Nov;24:115-22
pubmed: 24077335
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194849
pubmed: 29558504
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(1):85-90
pubmed: 7100960
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 11;11:166
pubmed: 21745402
Health Place. 2013 Nov;24:30-43
pubmed: 24021921
Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Aug 23;16(1):32
pubmed: 28830461
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177091
pubmed: 28486522
Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2003 Dec;30(6):865-884
pubmed: 34188345
Health Place. 2010 Sep;16(5):1038-52
pubmed: 20630792
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0168208
pubmed: 27997577