Three-dimensional assessment of transverse displacement with Facemask and Maxgym in unilateral cleft lip and palate model.
Facemask
Maxgym
finite-element analysis
rapid maxillary expansion
slow maxillary expansion
transverse displacement
unilateral cleft lip and palate model
Journal
Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
ISSN: 1998-3905
Titre abrégé: J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent
Pays: India
ID NLM: 8710631
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
29
6
2019
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
27
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Growing patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) exhibit maxillary deficiency due to early surgical intervention. Maxillary protraction with expansion is the recommended treatment modality for deficient maxilla. Facemask is a conventional protraction appliance, and Maxgym is a new protraction appliance. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Maxgym with Facemask using finite-element analysis. A three-dimensional finite-element model consisting of 49,807 nodes and 185,620 tetrahedral-shaped elements was created using computed tomography scan of a patient with unilateral CLP. F1, F2, and F3 represent different protraction forces of facemask, and M1, M2, and M3 represent different protraction forces of Maxgym. E1 represents slow maxillary expansion (SME) force, and E2 represents rapid maxillary expansion (RME) force. Facemask and Maxgym forces were applied parallel to the occlusal plane from the middle of the clinical crown on the buccal side of the first premolars. The forces E1 and E2 were also applied on the middle of the crown height on the lingual side of the first premolars and the first molars to simulate expansion. The amount of displacement for Maxgym and Facemask forces in transverse direction was analyzed designating specific nodes to represent dental and skeletal structures. The dental and skeletal structures were displaced in transverse direction under all loading conditions. Only expansion or protraction force resulted in transverse displacement of nodes. RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to SME. Maxgym forces produce greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask. Maxgym with RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to Maxgym with SME, whereas facemask with RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask with SME. Maxgym forces produce greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask with or without expansion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Growing patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) exhibit maxillary deficiency due to early surgical intervention. Maxillary protraction with expansion is the recommended treatment modality for deficient maxilla. Facemask is a conventional protraction appliance, and Maxgym is a new protraction appliance. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Maxgym with Facemask using finite-element analysis.
METHODS
METHODS
A three-dimensional finite-element model consisting of 49,807 nodes and 185,620 tetrahedral-shaped elements was created using computed tomography scan of a patient with unilateral CLP. F1, F2, and F3 represent different protraction forces of facemask, and M1, M2, and M3 represent different protraction forces of Maxgym. E1 represents slow maxillary expansion (SME) force, and E2 represents rapid maxillary expansion (RME) force. Facemask and Maxgym forces were applied parallel to the occlusal plane from the middle of the clinical crown on the buccal side of the first premolars. The forces E1 and E2 were also applied on the middle of the crown height on the lingual side of the first premolars and the first molars to simulate expansion. The amount of displacement for Maxgym and Facemask forces in transverse direction was analyzed designating specific nodes to represent dental and skeletal structures.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The dental and skeletal structures were displaced in transverse direction under all loading conditions. Only expansion or protraction force resulted in transverse displacement of nodes. RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to SME. Maxgym forces produce greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask. Maxgym with RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to Maxgym with SME, whereas facemask with RME produces greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask with SME.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Maxgym forces produce greater transverse displacement as compared to facemask with or without expansion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31249183
pii: JIndianSocPedodPrevDent_2019_37_2_177_261336
doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_207_18
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
177-184Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None