[Postoperative mobilization after total hip arthroplasty : Measured by Fitbit activity trackers].
Die postoperative Mobilisation nach Hüfttotalendoprothesenimplantation : Messung mittels Fitbit-Tracker.
Fitness trackers
Hip replacement, total
Hospital stay
Postoperative period
Software tools
Journal
Der Orthopade
ISSN: 1433-0431
Titre abrégé: Orthopade
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0331266
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
7
3
2020
entrez:
29
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients are becoming increasingly more independent and self-determined, in addition to having shorter post-operative hospitalization. This is why it is more important than ever to actively involve patients in the follow-up treatment. The question arises as to whether post-operative rehabilitation can be improved with modern devices. As part of a prospective study, the post-operative mobilization was recorded and analyzed by Fitbit®-activity-trackers between 05/2016 and 08/2017 in 100 patients who received a THA. 50 men (Ø 70.6y) and 50 women (Ø 71.1y) were included. Furthermore, the patients were interviewed about their acceptance of the Fitbit®-wristband. The average hospital stay was 7.98 days (SD ± 1.76). The number of steps on the first post-operative day was 712 (SD ± 617). On average (during total hospitalization), 1528 (SD ± 1076) steps were completed daily. One day before discharge, the average number of steps was 2165 (SD ± 1570) on that particular day. There were no gender differences in age and pre-operative Harris hip scores (♂55.3 vs. ♀53.9). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in the number of steps on the first postoperative day (♂745 vs. ♀678). A statistically significant result can be found in the number of steps prior to discharge: on this day, the men took 2483 and the women 1846 steps (p = 0.04). 42% of our patients own a modern smartphone and are able to operate software applications. 52% of the patients found the activity tracker to be motivating, 65% were open to new technologies (e.g. activity trackers) in the hospital. 14% did not check at all or only queried their wristband data once a day, 65% queried 2-4 times/day, and 21% retrieved the data >5 times/day. On average, 1528 steps were completed daily. In a comparison of the men and women, the men were only able to demonstrate significantly more steps than the women on the day prior to discharge. The men had significantly shorter hospital stays than the women. The younger the patients, the more mobile they were. A majority of patients are familiar with and/or interested in new technologies. This interest and curiosity should be consciously used for integration in the post-operative treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients are becoming increasingly more independent and self-determined, in addition to having shorter post-operative hospitalization. This is why it is more important than ever to actively involve patients in the follow-up treatment. The question arises as to whether post-operative rehabilitation can be improved with modern devices.
METHODS
METHODS
As part of a prospective study, the post-operative mobilization was recorded and analyzed by Fitbit®-activity-trackers between 05/2016 and 08/2017 in 100 patients who received a THA. 50 men (Ø 70.6y) and 50 women (Ø 71.1y) were included. Furthermore, the patients were interviewed about their acceptance of the Fitbit®-wristband.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The average hospital stay was 7.98 days (SD ± 1.76). The number of steps on the first post-operative day was 712 (SD ± 617). On average (during total hospitalization), 1528 (SD ± 1076) steps were completed daily. One day before discharge, the average number of steps was 2165 (SD ± 1570) on that particular day. There were no gender differences in age and pre-operative Harris hip scores (♂55.3 vs. ♀53.9). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in the number of steps on the first postoperative day (♂745 vs. ♀678). A statistically significant result can be found in the number of steps prior to discharge: on this day, the men took 2483 and the women 1846 steps (p = 0.04). 42% of our patients own a modern smartphone and are able to operate software applications. 52% of the patients found the activity tracker to be motivating, 65% were open to new technologies (e.g. activity trackers) in the hospital. 14% did not check at all or only queried their wristband data once a day, 65% queried 2-4 times/day, and 21% retrieved the data >5 times/day.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
On average, 1528 steps were completed daily. In a comparison of the men and women, the men were only able to demonstrate significantly more steps than the women on the day prior to discharge. The men had significantly shorter hospital stays than the women. The younger the patients, the more mobile they were. A majority of patients are familiar with and/or interested in new technologies. This interest and curiosity should be consciously used for integration in the post-operative treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31250078
doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03768-9
pii: 10.1007/s00132-019-03768-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
230-237Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov;(404):34-9
pubmed: 12439235
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep;27(8 Suppl):2-7.e1
pubmed: 22682044
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 28;168(14):1576-84
pubmed: 18663171
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):2130-2137
pubmed: 28488253
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Nov;19(11):1270-85
pubmed: 21907813
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):1057-61
pubmed: 23992697
Sports Med. 2004;34(5):281-91
pubmed: 15107007
J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(5):286-90
pubmed: 26017748
J Med Eng Technol. 2013 Oct;37(7):456-62
pubmed: 24007317
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
pubmed: 5783851
J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Mar;11(1):37-45
pubmed: 20198405
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Apr;93(4):449-55
pubmed: 21464481
Sports Med. 2002;32(12):795-808
pubmed: 12238942
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 18;12:159
pubmed: 26684758
Orthopade. 2006 Jul;35(7):708, 710-15
pubmed: 16718490
Med Eng Phys. 2018 Jan;51:31-40
pubmed: 29117912
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;185:138-40
pubmed: 25795203
Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1450-1454
pubmed: 27803219
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Oct;62(10):923-30
pubmed: 12972468
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jul;(388):33-40
pubmed: 11451130
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Aug;467(8):2053-8
pubmed: 19247729
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S162-S165
pubmed: 28343831
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jul;(388):58-67
pubmed: 11451133
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Dec;94(12):1604-10
pubmed: 23188899
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20;93(14):1335-8
pubmed: 21792500
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct 12;7:24
pubmed: 26464801
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Aug;17(5):544-9
pubmed: 12168167
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Apr;41 Supp 1:3-6
pubmed: 12173279