Anxiety and distress following receipt of results from routine HPV primary testing in cervical screening: The psychological impact of primary screening (PIPS) study.


Journal

International journal of cancer
ISSN: 1097-0215
Titre abrégé: Int J Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0042124

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 04 2020
Historique:
received: 15 05 2019
revised: 14 06 2019
accepted: 24 06 2019
pubmed: 30 6 2019
medline: 19 5 2020
entrez: 29 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We used a cross-sectional survey to examine short-term anxiety and distress in women receiving different results following routine human papillomavirus (HPV) primary testing at cervical screening. Participants were women aged 24-65 (n = 1,127) who had attended screening at one of five sites piloting HPV primary screening in England, including a control group with normal cytology who were not tested for HPV. Women completed a postal questionnaire ~2 weeks after receiving their screening result. Unadjusted mean anxiety scores ranged from 32.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 12.2) in HPV-negative women to 42.1 (SD = 14.9) in women who were HPV-positive with abnormal cytology. In adjusted analyses, anxiety was significantly higher in women testing HPV-positive with either normal cytology (mean difference [MD] = 3.5, CI: 0.6-6.4) or abnormal cytology (MD = 7.2, CI: 3.7-10.6), than the control group. Distress was slightly higher in women who tested HPV-positive with abnormal cytology (MD = 0.9, CI: 0.02-1.8), than the control group. We also found increased odds of very high anxiety in women who tested HPV-positive with normal or abnormal cytology compared to the control group. This pattern of results was only observed among women receiving their first HPV-positive result, not among women found to have persistent HPV at 12-month follow-up. Testing HPV-positive with normal cytology for the first time, is associated with elevated anxiety despite carrying very low immediate cervical cancer risk. However, receiving the same test result at 12-month early recall does not appear to be associated with higher anxiety, suggesting anxiety may normalise with repeated exposure and/or over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31251820
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32540
pmc: PMC7065242
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2113-2121

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C49896/A17429
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C7492/A17219
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DRF-2017-10-105
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.

Références

Int J Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;119(5):1095-101
pubmed: 16586444
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 13;8(2):e019171
pubmed: 29440214
Br J Cancer. 2005 Jan 31;92(2):265-70
pubmed: 15655553
Psychooncology. 2012 Oct;21(10):1071-81
pubmed: 21695747
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S467-72
pubmed: 22588767
J Med Screen. 2017 Jun;24(2):110-112
pubmed: 27363972
Br J Cancer. 2008 Mar 11;98(5):863-9
pubmed: 18283313
Psychooncology. 2007 Mar;16(3):196-204
pubmed: 16858719
Psychol Bull. 1991 Jul;110(1):67-85
pubmed: 1891519
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 May;90(3):201-7
pubmed: 24412997
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 18;106(8):
pubmed: 25038467
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):255-62
pubmed: 12900095
Cancer Res. 2006 Nov 1;66(21):10630-6
pubmed: 17062559
BMJ. 2010 Feb 23;340:b4491
pubmed: 20179125
Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6
pubmed: 1393159
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):743-8
pubmed: 17944916
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196
pubmed: 24762804
Int J Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;145(1):29-39
pubmed: 30549273
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Apr;82(2):169-74
pubmed: 16581749
Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32
pubmed: 24192252
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):78-88
pubmed: 22177579
BMJ. 2019 Feb 6;364:l240
pubmed: 30728133
Br J Cancer. 2005 Mar 28;92(6):990-4
pubmed: 15785734
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):36-49
pubmed: 18605850
BJOG. 2004 Dec;111(12):1437-43
pubmed: 15663132
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Nov;13(51):1-150, iii-iv
pubmed: 19891902
Br J Clin Psychol. 1990 Nov;29(4):429-32
pubmed: 2289078
BMJ. 2004 May 29;328(7451):1293
pubmed: 15166066
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 23;6(12):e014356
pubmed: 28011816

Auteurs

Emily McBride (E)

Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Laura A V Marlow (LAV)

Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Alice S Forster (AS)

Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Deborah Ridout (D)

Population, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

Henry Kitchener (H)

Women's Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Julietta Patnick (J)

Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Jo Waller (J)

Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH