Glenoid retroversion is an important factor for humeral head centration and the biomechanics of posterior shoulder stability.
Glenoid dysplasia
Humeral head centration
Posterior shoulder instability
Retroversion
Shoulder biomechanics
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
06
01
2019
accepted:
17
06
2019
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
27
2
2020
entrez:
30
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Glenoid retroversion is a known independent risk factor for recurrent posterior instability. The purpose was to investigate progressive angles of glenoid retroversion and their influence on humeral head centration and posterior translation with intact, detached, and repaired posterior labrum in a cadaveric human shoulder model. A total of 10 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were investigated for this study. After CT- canning, the glenoids were aligned parallel to the floor, with the capsule intact, and the humerus was fixed in 60° of abduction and neutral rotation. Version of the glenoid was created after wedge resection from posterior and fixed with an external fixator throughout the testing. Specimens underwent three conditions: intact, detached, and repaired posterior labrum, while version of the glenoid was set from + 5° anteversion to - 25° retroversion by 5° increments. Within the biomechanical setup, the glenohumeral joint was axially loaded (22 N) to center the joint. At 0° of glenoid version and intact labrum, the initial position was used as baseline and served as point zero of centerization. After cyclic preloading, posterior translation force (20 N) was then applied by a material testing machine, while start and endpoints of the scapula placed on an X-Y table were measured. The decentralization of the humeral head at glenoid version angles of 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° of retroversion and 5° of anteversion was significantly different (P < 0.001). Every increment of 5° of retroversion led to an additional decentralization of the humeral head overall by (average ± SD) 2.0 mm ± 0.3 in the intact and 2.0 mm ± 0.7 in the detached labrum condition. The repaired showed significantly lower posterior translation compared to the intact condition at 10° (P = 0.012) and 15° (P < 0.01) of retroversion. In addition, CT measured parameters (depth, diameter, and native version) of the glenoid showed no correlation with angle of dislocation of each specimen. Bony alignment in terms of glenoid retroversion angle plays an important role in joint centration and posterior translation, especially in retroversion angles greater than 10°. Isolated posterior labrum repair has a significant effect on posterior translation in glenoid retroversion angles of 5° and 10°. Bony correction of glenoid version may be considered to address posterior shoulder instability with retroversion > 15°.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31254026
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05573-5
pii: 10.1007/s00167-019-05573-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3952-3961Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jul;21(7):902-9
pubmed: 21831665
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3222-3229
pubmed: 27528612
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Mar;(216):70-9
pubmed: 3815973
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jan;82(1):16-25
pubmed: 10653080
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 May-Jun;12(3):242-6
pubmed: 12851576
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 May-Jun;14(3):318-23
pubmed: 15889033
Arthroscopy. 2017 Feb;33(2):284-290
pubmed: 27717527
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1092-101
pubmed: 23337111
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jan;27(1):181-188
pubmed: 28965687
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Aug;21(8):1096-103
pubmed: 22036540
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):893-899
pubmed: 30509607
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1422-9
pubmed: 25794869
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;16(5):649-56
pubmed: 17644006
Arthroscopy. 2012 Oct;28(10):1337-43
pubmed: 22705299
Arthroscopy. 2017 Feb;33(2):254-260
pubmed: 27599823
Arthroscopy. 2010 Sep;26(9):1172-80
pubmed: 20810077
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jul;26(7):1278-1286
pubmed: 28162883
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1056-63
pubmed: 26948005
Arthroscopy. 2015 Mar;31(3):488-93
pubmed: 25498875
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1752-60
pubmed: 16085615
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):796-803
pubmed: 21131680
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966 Dec;48(8):1503-10
pubmed: 5955639
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):941-7
pubmed: 26944574
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1061-71
pubmed: 16567458
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 1;98(11):958-68
pubmed: 27252441
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug;74(7):1032-7
pubmed: 1522089
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85(8):1479-87
pubmed: 12925627
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;45(12):2849-2857
pubmed: 28771373
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992 Mar;1(2):66-76
pubmed: 22959042
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2645-9
pubmed: 23982394
Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Apr;29(4):204-10
pubmed: 10855468
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;11(4):309-14
pubmed: 12195246
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2792-2799
pubmed: 27496904
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2005-14
pubmed: 23804588
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967 Apr;49(3):471-6
pubmed: 6022356
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):299-304
pubmed: 30374569
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1805-17
pubmed: 25862038