IMproving the practice of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate MOnitoring with cardiotocography for safer childbirth (the IMMO programme): protocol for a qualitative study.
cardiotocography
electronic fetal heartrate monitoring
fetal medicine
qualitative research
quality in health care
risk management
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 06 2019
28 06 2019
Historique:
entrez:
1
7
2019
pubmed:
1
7
2019
medline:
26
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Suboptimal electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM) in labour using cardiotocography (CTG) has been identified as one of the most common causes of avoidable harm in maternity care. Training staff is a frequently proposed solution to reduce harm. However, current approaches to training are heterogeneous in content and format, making it difficult to assess effectiveness. Technological solutions, such as digital decision support, have not yet demonstrated improved outcomes. Effective improvement strategies require in-depth understanding of the technical and social mechanisms underpinning the EFM process. The aim of this study is to advance current knowledge of the types of errors, hazards and failure modes in the process of classifying, interpreting and responding to CTG traces. This study is part of a broader research programme aimed at developing and testing an intervention to improve intrapartum EFM. The study is organised into two workstreams. First, we will conduct observations and interviews in three UK maternity units to gain an in-depth understanding of how intrapartum EFM is performed in routine clinical practice. Data analysis will combine the insights of an ethnographic approach (focused on the social norms and interactions, values and meanings that appear to be linked with the process of EFM) with a systems thinking approach (focused on modelling processes, actors and their interactions). Second, we will use risk analysis techniques to develop a framework of the errors, hazards and failure modes that affect intrapartum EFM. This study has been approved by the West Midlands-South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee, reference number: 18/WM/0292. Dissemination will take the form of academic articles in peer-reviewed journals and conferences, along with tailored communication with various stakeholders in maternity care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31256041
pii: bmjopen-2019-030271
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030271
pmc: PMC6609047
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e030271Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : WT09789
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: TD is a trustee of the PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training (PROMPT) Maternity Foundation. The PROMPT Maternity Foundation (PMF) is an independent charity (registered charity number 1140557) set up to save the lives of mothers and babies through evidence-based, multi-professional training and research. This includes training on fetal heart rate monitoring. TD and CW are members of the steering group of PMF. CW is seconded from North Bristol Trust as the lead research midwife for PMF.
Références
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 May;21(5):369-80
pubmed: 22421911
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1015-1021
pubmed: 28971880
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1046-1064
pubmed: 29394872
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6):623.e1-5
pubmed: 18667185
Health Serv Manage Res. 2005 Nov;18(4):211-6
pubmed: 16259668
BJOG. 2011 Jul;118(8):926-35
pubmed: 21658193
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 May;95(5):596-603
pubmed: 26873144
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Sep;96(9):1075-1083
pubmed: 28524258
BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):409-18
pubmed: 16553652
Appl Ergon. 2006 Jul;37(4):525-35
pubmed: 16756937
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD006066
pubmed: 28157275
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 27;368(26):2445-8
pubmed: 23802513
Nurse Res. 2006 Jul 1;13(4):84
pubmed: 27702218
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1:i50-8
pubmed: 17142610
Risk Anal. 2018 May;38(5):978-990
pubmed: 29105803
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):14-25
pubmed: 23845724
Appl Ergon. 2006 Sep;37(5):669-79
pubmed: 16182230
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct;52(2):133-41
pubmed: 16164474
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;213(6):856.e1-8
pubmed: 26348383
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Jul-Aug;35(4):547-56
pubmed: 16882001
BJOG. 2016 May;123(6):866-9
pubmed: 26773808
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Jun;21(3):214-24
pubmed: 19363123
Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):e279-85
pubmed: 21295386
BJOG. 2003 Jan;110(1):1-5
pubmed: 12504927
Med Educ. 2016 Apr;50(4):400-8
pubmed: 26995480
Midwifery. 2006 Jun;22(2):125-36
pubmed: 16126312
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 18;17(1):88
pubmed: 28521768
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):65-9
pubmed: 25560106
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):42-52
pubmed: 22976504
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):40-4
pubmed: 12078368
Anesth Analg. 2010 May 1;110(5):1499-502
pubmed: 20418310
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Mar;23(3):196-205
pubmed: 23813211
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Oct;12(5):326-7
pubmed: 14532360
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Mar;3(1):37-41
pubmed: 22325800
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):612-9
pubmed: 20692743