Family role in in-patient rehabilitation: the cases of England and Turkey.


Journal

Disability and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1464-5165
Titre abrégé: Disabil Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207179

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 2 7 2019
medline: 6 7 2021
entrez: 2 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This article explores the differences between experiences of family role in in-patient rehabilitation in Turkey and England. The literature predominantly assumes family presence in rehabilitation as positive, because it draws upon Western cases, where care is delivered fully by professionals, and patients may feel isolated during hospital stays. Analyses of other contexts provide a more nuanced view. This qualitative research included in-depth interviews (Turkey: 42, England: 18) with people with disabilities ( Families are differently integrated in rehabilitation in England and Turkey. In England, where family presence is regulated and relatively limited, people with disabilities feel more isolated and see family as a major form of support. In Turkey, where family presence is unregulated and intense, they enjoy family as an agent of intra-hospital socialising, but find it disabling when it implies a loss of privacy and individuality. Family involvement in rehabilitation should support social interaction but allow people with disabilities to remain independent.Implications for rehabilitationFamily involvement in rehabilitation can be both enabling and disabling.Existing literature draws upon rehabilitation practices, where family presence is limited and perceived as positive. An analysis of cases, where families are integral to the health care system (e.g., Turkey), can provide a nuanced view of family integration, which can be both enabling and disabling.Rehabilitation processes and health professionals need to integrate families in ways that will enrich social interaction, but still allow people with disabilities to retain their independence.

Sections du résumé

PURPOSE
This article explores the differences between experiences of family role in in-patient rehabilitation in Turkey and England.
BACKGROUND
The literature predominantly assumes family presence in rehabilitation as positive, because it draws upon Western cases, where care is delivered fully by professionals, and patients may feel isolated during hospital stays. Analyses of other contexts provide a more nuanced view.
METHOD
This qualitative research included in-depth interviews (Turkey: 42, England: 18) with people with disabilities (
RESULTS
Families are differently integrated in rehabilitation in England and Turkey. In England, where family presence is regulated and relatively limited, people with disabilities feel more isolated and see family as a major form of support. In Turkey, where family presence is unregulated and intense, they enjoy family as an agent of intra-hospital socialising, but find it disabling when it implies a loss of privacy and individuality.
CONCLUSION
Family involvement in rehabilitation should support social interaction but allow people with disabilities to remain independent.Implications for rehabilitationFamily involvement in rehabilitation can be both enabling and disabling.Existing literature draws upon rehabilitation practices, where family presence is limited and perceived as positive. An analysis of cases, where families are integral to the health care system (e.g., Turkey), can provide a nuanced view of family integration, which can be both enabling and disabling.Rehabilitation processes and health professionals need to integrate families in ways that will enrich social interaction, but still allow people with disabilities to retain their independence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31257955
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1632941
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

559-567

Auteurs

Dikmen Bezmez (D)

Sociology Department, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Tom Shakespeare (T)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

Sibel Yardimci (S)

Sociology Department, Mimar Sinan University of Fine Arts, Istanbul, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH