When an Event Is Perceived Depends on Where We Attend.

attention spatiotemporal factors temporal processing time perception

Journal

i-Perception
ISSN: 2041-6695
Titre abrégé: Iperception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101574031

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 14 01 2019
accepted: 15 05 2019
entrez: 2 7 2019
pubmed: 2 7 2019
medline: 2 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Does the moment when an event is perceived depends on where it is presented? To measure when participants perceived events, they were first familiarized with trial duration, by watching the hand of a clock rotating. Then, the hand was removed, and stimuli were presented at a random time from the trial onset. Participants indicated the location where the hand would have been when the stimulus was presented. The stimuli's eccentricity, the appearance, and location of the spatial features of the clock were varied. The targets were reported earlier if they were presented in spatial proximity to the clock outline, even when it was not presented during the trial. The effect was replicated with stimuli presented at the same distance from fixation but at different distances from the spatial features. In summary, the time of an event is perceived earlier if it is presented near attended features in the visual scene.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31258884
doi: 10.1177/2041669519858096
pii: 10.1177_2041669519858096
pmc: PMC6587391
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2041669519858096

Références

J Vis. 2008 Feb 29;8(2):14.1-8
pubmed: 18318640
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90
pubmed: 24203555
Iperception. 2019 Jun 19;10(3):2041669519858096
pubmed: 31258884
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):699-700
pubmed: 12819786
Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7;16(5):472-9
pubmed: 16527741
Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Oct 28;5:71
pubmed: 22065490
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):364-79
pubmed: 20056554
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jul;150:136-45
pubmed: 24880978
Vision Res. 2006 Jun;46(13):2028-40
pubmed: 16481020
Vision Res. 2002 Apr;42(8):949-67
pubmed: 11934448
Vision Res. 2006 Sep;46(18):2998-3008
pubmed: 16677680
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Oct;56(4):367-72
pubmed: 6193950
Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):205-12
pubmed: 11437302
Neuroreport. 2010 Jan 27;21(2):84-9
pubmed: 19884866
Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):673-86
pubmed: 7808276
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:65-86
pubmed: 19733750
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Nov;129(3):365-75
pubmed: 18849020
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2004;64(3):319-28
pubmed: 15283475
Science. 2004 Mar 5;303(5663):1506-8
pubmed: 15001776
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 05;3:459
pubmed: 23162507
Psychol Sci. 2003 May;14(3):225-31
pubmed: 12741745
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):791-9
pubmed: 22285796
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1171-89
pubmed: 15751474
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):330-43
pubmed: 20403583

Auteurs

Ljubica Jovanovic (L)

Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France; Neuropsychologie Cognitive, Physiopathologie de la Schizophrénie, Inserm UR 1114, University of Strasbourg, France.

Pascal Mamassian (P)

Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH