A review on the reliability of hemodynamic modeling in intracranial aneurysms: why computational fluid dynamics alone cannot solve the equation.

3DRA = 3D rotational angiography CFD = computational fluid dynamics IA = intracranial aneurysm computational fluid dynamics imaging intracranial aneurysms segmentation uncertainty quantification

Journal

Neurosurgical focus
ISSN: 1092-0684
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Focus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896471

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 07 2019
Historique:
received: 01 03 2019
accepted: 09 04 2019
entrez: 2 7 2019
pubmed: 2 7 2019
medline: 25 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Computational blood flow modeling in intracranial aneurysms (IAs) has enormous potential for the assessment of highly resolved hemodynamics and derived wall stresses. This results in an improved knowledge in important research fields, such as rupture risk assessment and treatment optimization. However, due to the requirement of assumptions and simplifications, its applicability in a clinical context remains limited.This review article focuses on the main aspects along the interdisciplinary modeling chain and highlights the circumstance that computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are embedded in a multiprocess workflow. These aspects include imaging-related steps, the setup of realistic hemodynamic simulations, and the analysis of multidimensional computational results. To condense the broad knowledge, specific recommendations are provided at the end of each subsection.Overall, various individual substudies exist in the literature that have evaluated relevant technical aspects. In this regard, the importance of precise vessel segmentations for the simulation outcome is emphasized. Furthermore, the accuracy of the computational model strongly depends on the specific research question. Additionally, standardization in the context of flow analysis is required to enable an objective comparison of research findings and to avoid confusion within the medical community. Finally, uncertainty quantification and validation studies should always accompany numerical investigations.In conclusion, this review aims for an improved awareness among physicians regarding potential sources of error in hemodynamic modeling for IAs. Although CFD is a powerful methodology, it cannot provide reliable information, if pre- and postsimulation steps are inaccurately carried out. From this, future studies can be critically evaluated and real benefits can be differentiated from results that have been acquired based on technically inaccurate procedures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31261119
doi: 10.3171/2019.4.FOCUS19181
pii: 2019.4.FOCUS19181
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

E15

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Philipp Berg (P)

1Department of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows.
2Research CampusSTIMULATE, and.

Sylvia Saalfeld (S)

2Research CampusSTIMULATE, and.
3Department of Simulation and Graphics, University of Magdeburg; and.

Samuel Voß (S)

1Department of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows.
2Research CampusSTIMULATE, and.

Oliver Beuing (O)

2Research CampusSTIMULATE, and.
4Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Gábor Janiga (G)

1Department of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows.
2Research CampusSTIMULATE, and.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH