Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol.
Contrast media
Gadobutrol
Gadoterate meglumine
Magnetic resonance imaging
Prostate
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
06
12
2018
accepted:
11
06
2019
revised:
27
05
2019
pubmed:
3
7
2019
medline:
11
2
2020
entrez:
3
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To intraindividually compare the signal-enhancing effect of 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine and 1.0 M gadobutrol in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) imaging of the prostate. Fifty patients who underwent two 3-T MR examinations of the prostate were included in this IRB-approved retrospective uncontrolled, unrandomized study. All received two scans (mean time interval, 20.5 months) including T1-weighted DCE-MR imaging, one with 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine and one with 1.0 M gadobutrol. Equimolar doses of gadolinium (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) were administered with identical injection speed (2 mL/s), resulting in differing gadolinium delivery rate. An identical region of interest (ROI There was a significantly larger area under the time-enhancement curve (5.53 vs 4.97 p = 0.0007) and higher relative enhancement of BPH nodules (2.23 vs 1.96 p < 0.0001) with gadobutrol compared with gadoterate meglumine. There were no significant differences in SNR (44.55 vs 37.63 p = 0.12), CNR (31.22 vs 26.39 p = 0.18), and pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans (0.31 vs 0.32 p = 0.86), Ve (1.36 vs 0.98 p = 0.13), and Kep (0.34 vs 0.36 p = 0.12). At equimolar doses, increased gadolinium delivery over time using gadobutrol provides higher relative enhancement parameters in BPH nodules compared with gadoterate meglumine, but does not translate into improved SNR or CNR. • At equal injection rate and equimolar total dose, gadobutrol compared with gadoterate meglumine provides a significantly greater relative enhancement in DCE-MR imaging of BPH over the first 180 s. • There are no significant differences in SNRs, CNRs, and pharmacokinetic parameters between the two GBCAs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31264013
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06321-6
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06321-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Organometallic Compounds
0
gadobutrol
1BJ477IO2L
Meglumine
6HG8UB2MUY
Gadolinium
AU0V1LM3JT
gadoterate meglumine
L0ND3981AG
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6982-6990Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : 1340/1 2018
Références
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2003 Oct;46(4):593-5
pubmed: 15025351
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov;191(5):1339-46
pubmed: 18941066
Radiographics. 2016 Sep-Oct;36(5):1354-72
pubmed: 27471952
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):2095-2109
pubmed: 27491874
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Jan-Feb;7(1):91-101
pubmed: 9039598
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Jan;82(1):139-45
pubmed: 21890295
Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):470-80
pubmed: 18758786
Acta Radiol. 2016 Nov;57(11):1334-1343
pubmed: 26071496
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):1399-405
pubmed: 18504760
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Sep;38(9):1681-1688
pubmed: 28663267
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Mar;31(3):549-55
pubmed: 20187196
Invest Radiol. 2013 Mar;48(3):121-8
pubmed: 23211552
Neuroradiology. 2017 Dec;59(12):1233-1239
pubmed: 28913611
Prostate. 2013 Apr;73(5):467-75
pubmed: 22996830
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jan;27(1):286-295
pubmed: 26960538
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Aug;26(2):375-85
pubmed: 17622966
Eur Radiol. 1997;7 Suppl 5:276-80
pubmed: 9370559
FASEB J. 1987 Nov;1(5):365-74
pubmed: 3315805
Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):837-49
pubmed: 25249313
Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):1058-67
pubmed: 21174098
Invest Radiol. 2008 Dec;43(12):817-28
pubmed: 19002053
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 Dec;94(12):1187-204
pubmed: 24211260
Eur Radiol. 2011 Mar;21(3):616-26
pubmed: 21184082
Invest Radiol. 2005 Nov;40(11):715-24
pubmed: 16230904
Eur J Radiol. 2008 May;66(2):160-7
pubmed: 18358659
Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):396-408
pubmed: 21163915
Invest Radiol. 2014 Jul;49(7):474-84
pubmed: 24637587
Radiology. 1999 Apr;211(1):101-10
pubmed: 10189459
Ther Drug Monit. 2013 Aug;35(4):443-9
pubmed: 23851909
Magn Reson Med. 1991 Feb;17(2):357-67
pubmed: 2062210
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jan;8(1):124-8
pubmed: 24596742
Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Sep;6(6):599-603
pubmed: 10493630
Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr;25(4):1097-106
pubmed: 25424563
Rofo. 2013 Sep;185(9):862-8
pubmed: 23888476
Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):70-7
pubmed: 17404740
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jun;204(6):1311-21
pubmed: 26001243
Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):820-8
pubmed: 26123410
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Jul;63(1):110-9
pubmed: 17306946
Radiologia. 2018 Jan - Feb;60(1):49-56
pubmed: 29217300
Radiology. 2003 Mar;226(3):880-8
pubmed: 12601217
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;36(5):1213-21
pubmed: 22848033
Clin Radiol. 2013 Jun;68(6):e323-30
pubmed: 23528164
Magn Reson Med. 2002 Dec;48(6):1068-71
pubmed: 12465119