Virtual versus true non-contrast dual-energy CT imaging for the diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma.
Aged
Algorithms
Aortic Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Hematoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Male
Middle Aged
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection
/ methods
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Acute disease
Aorta
Humans
In vitro
Tomography, x-ray computed
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
11
02
2019
accepted:
11
06
2019
revised:
24
05
2019
pubmed:
3
7
2019
medline:
19
2
2020
entrez:
3
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess whether virtual non-contrast (VNC) images derived from contrast dual-layer dual-energy computed tomography (DL-DECT) images could replace true non-contrast (TNC) images for aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) diagnosis in acute aortic syndrome (AAS) imaging protocols by performing quantitative as well as qualitative phantom and clinical studies. Patients with confirmed IMH were included retrospectively in two centers. For in vitro imaging, a custom-made phantom of IMH was placed in a semi-anthropomorphic thorax phantom (QRM GmbH) and imaged on a DL-DECT at 120 kVp under various conditions of patient size, radiation exposure, and reconstruction modes. For in vivo imaging, 21 patients (70 ± 13 years) who underwent AAS imaging protocols at 120 kVp were included. In both studies, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between hematoma and lumen was compared using a paired t test. Diagnostic confidence (1 = non-diagnostic, 4 = exemplary) for VNC and TNC images was rated by two radiologists and compared. Effective radiation doses for each acquisition were calculated. In both the phantom and clinical studies, we observed that the CNRs were similar between the VNC and TNC images. Moreover, both methods allowed differentiating the hyper-attenuation within the hematoma from the blood. Finally, we obtained equivalent high diagnostic confidence with both VNC and TNC images (VNC = 3.2 ± 0.7, TNC = 3.1 ± 0.7; p = 0.3). Finally, by suppressing TNC acquisition and using VNC, the mean effective dose reduction would be 40%. DL-DECT offers similar performances with VNC and TNC images for IMH diagnosis without compromise in diagnostic image quality. • Dual-layer dual-energy CT enables virtual non-contrast imaging from a contrast-enhanced acquisition. • Virtual non-contrast imaging with dual-layer dual-energy CT reduces the number of acquisitions and radiation exposure in acute aortic syndrome imaging protocol. • Dual-layer dual-energy CT has the potential to become a suitable imaging tool for acute aortic syndrome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31264015
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06322-5
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06322-5
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6762-6771Références
Eur Radiol. 2010 Dec;20(12):2870-5
pubmed: 20623126
Clin Radiol. 2005 Dec;60(12):1256-67
pubmed: 16291307
Med Phys. 2018 Jun;45(6):2486-2497
pubmed: 29624708
Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar;68(3):264-71
pubmed: 22974566
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84
pubmed: 18046031
Invest Radiol. 2018 Jun;53(6):321-327
pubmed: 29329150
Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):433-40
pubmed: 19487466
Eur Radiol. 2014 Apr;24(4):834-40
pubmed: 24258277
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):2392-8
pubmed: 24120225
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2745-2755
pubmed: 29404773
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):175-84
pubmed: 19332852
Am Heart J. 1997 Sep;134(3):495-507
pubmed: 9327708
Radiology. 1976 Dec;121(3 Pt. 1):635-40
pubmed: 981659
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1982 Aug;6(4):750-6
pubmed: 7119193
Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):532-9
pubmed: 23690725
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150705
pubmed: 26916280
Eur Radiol. 2011 Mar;21(3):510-7
pubmed: 21249371
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Dec;98(12):881-891
pubmed: 29066126
JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):754-63
pubmed: 27533160
Herz. 2011 Sep;36(6):488-97
pubmed: 21887530
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266-369
pubmed: 20233780
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jul;104:108-114
pubmed: 29857855
Radiol Med. 2007 Feb;112(1):1-20
pubmed: 17310295
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:8491-4
pubmed: 22256319
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Jan;19(1):204-217
pubmed: 29266724
Radiology. 2015 Sep;276(3):637-53
pubmed: 26302388
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005 Oct;26(5):281-304
pubmed: 16274000
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):e398-405
pubmed: 22236702
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Apr;202(4):W314-24
pubmed: 24660729
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Mar;42(3):702-709
pubmed: 28084546
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20150860
pubmed: 27043480
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926
pubmed: 25173340