The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal.
Catheter tip malposition
Obesity
Peritoneal dialysis access
Peritoneal dialysis catheter location
Polycystic kidney disease
Journal
International urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1573-2584
Titre abrégé: Int Urol Nephrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0262521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
07
01
2019
accepted:
14
05
2019
pubmed:
3
7
2019
medline:
20
2
2020
entrez:
3
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Peritoneal catheter dysfunction is a frequent complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Traditionally, dysfunction has been attributed to catheter malposition, but whether the location of the catheter tip in the small pelvis really determines proper function is unclear. We reviewed 900 abdominal X-ray images of PD patients from a 7-year period in two PD units that use different catheter types (straight and Swan Neck Curled). In 52% of the images, the dialysis catheter tip was located in the ideal position in the small pelvis and in 48% in other sites. Peritoneal catheter function was normal at the time of imaging in 87% of those with ideal catheter tip position, and in 74% of those with other than ideal position. The tip was located in small pelvis in 35% of images performed during catheter dysfunction and in 56% of those performed during normal catheter function. There were no differences between two catheter types. The positive predictive value of abdominal X-ray images to predict catheter function was 26%, and the negative predictive value 87%. We also found a significant positive correlation between polycystic kidney disease and normal catheter function. In contrast, obese patients were more likely to have catheter malfunction. Previous abdominal surgery was not associated with catheter dysfunction. Our data showed a higher probability of normal function of peritoneal catheters whose tips were located in the small pelvis. However, also malpositioned catheters generally functioned well, and malpositioning of the PD catheter did not in itself explain its malfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31264086
doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02177-3
pii: 10.1007/s11255-019-02177-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1867-1872Références
Perit Dial Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):443-9
pubmed: 24584608
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2015 Jun;19(3):521-6
pubmed: 25030751
Perit Dial Int. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):41-5
pubmed: 20056978
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Jul;26(7):2332-9
pubmed: 21115669
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Mar;47(3):557-62
pubmed: 25547920
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jun;57(6):903-7
pubmed: 21458901
Perit Dial Int. 2015 Dec;35(7):760-2
pubmed: 26703848
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94 Suppl 4:S64-70
pubmed: 22043569
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Aug;49(8):1481-1488
pubmed: 28455661
Int J Artif Organs. 2006 Jan;29(1):142-52
pubmed: 16485250
Perit Dial Int. 1998 May-Jun;18(3):256-9
pubmed: 9663888
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(48):e2166
pubmed: 26632899
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1714-1723
pubmed: 28917008
Kidney Int. 2014 Nov;86(5):1001-6
pubmed: 24940799
Adv Perit Dial. 1991;7:214-7
pubmed: 1680429
Perit Dial Int. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):107-8
pubmed: 22302927
Perit Dial Int. 2016 11-12;36(6):655-661
pubmed: 27044797
Perit Dial Int. 2015 Sep-Oct;35(5):530-6
pubmed: 25292408
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016 Jun;68(3):302-10
pubmed: 25679793
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):924-935
pubmed: 27524427
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Sep;56(5):1359-64
pubmed: 26256980