Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI.
Attenuation correction
Brain imaging
Deep learning
PET/MRI
Quantitative imaging
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
05
02
2019
accepted:
28
05
2019
pubmed:
3
7
2019
medline:
24
9
2020
entrez:
3
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Quantitative PET/MR imaging is challenged by the accuracy of synthetic CT (sCT) generation from MR images. Deep learning-based algorithms have recently gained momentum for a number of medical image analysis applications. In this work, a novel sCT generation algorithm based on deep learning adversarial semantic structure (DL-AdvSS) is proposed for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI. The proposed DL-AdvSS algorithm exploits the ASS learning framework to constrain the synthetic CT generation process to comply with the extracted structural features from CT images. The proposed technique was evaluated through comparison to an atlas-based sCT generation method (Atlas), previously developed for MRI-only or PET/MRI-guided radiation planning. Moreover, the commercial segmentation-based approach (Segm) implemented on the Philips TF PET/MRI system was included in the evaluation. Clinical brain studies of 40 patients who underwent PET/CT and MR imaging were used for the evaluation of the proposed method under a two-fold cross validation scheme. The accuracy of cortical bone extraction and CT value estimation were investigated for the three different methods. Atlas and DL-AdvSS exhibited similar cortical bone extraction accuracy resulting in a Dice coefficient of 0.78 ± 0.07 and 0.77 ± 0.07, respectively. Likewise, DL-AdvSS and Atlas techniques performed similarly in terms of CT value estimation in the cortical bone region where a mean error (ME) of less than -11 HU was obtained. The Segm approach led to a ME of -1025 HU. Furthermore, the quantitative analysis of corresponding PET images using the three approaches assuming the CT-based attenuation corrected PET (PET The proposed DL-AdvSS approach demonstrated competitive performance with respect to the state-of-the-art atlas-based technique achieving clinically tolerable errors, thus outperforming the commercial segmentation approach used in the clinic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31264170
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04380-x
pii: 10.1007/s00259-019-04380-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2746-2759Références
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 14;:
pubmed: 29901223
PET Clin. 2016 Apr;11(2):161-77
pubmed: 26952729
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Jan;35(1):174-83
pubmed: 26241970
J Nucl Med. 2010 May;51(5):812-8
pubmed: 20439508
Med Phys. 2003 May;30(5):937-48
pubmed: 12773003
Semin Nucl Med. 2015 May;45(3):212-23
pubmed: 25841276
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):5218-5233
pubmed: 30216462
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 15;34(2):518-41
pubmed: 17113312
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Oct;43(11):2021-35
pubmed: 27260522
Med Image Anal. 2018 Jul;47:31-44
pubmed: 29674235
J Nucl Med. 2019 Apr;60(4):555-560
pubmed: 30166355
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Apr;37(4):955-965
pubmed: 29610074
Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 15;162:276-288
pubmed: 28918316
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2017 Sep;10435:417-425
pubmed: 30009283
Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1130-55
pubmed: 26936700
J Nucl Med. 2018 May;59(5):852-858
pubmed: 29084824
Med Phys. 2015 Aug;42(8):4974-86
pubmed: 26233223
EJNMMI Phys. 2018 Nov 12;5(1):24
pubmed: 30417316
J Nucl Med. 2009 Apr;50(4):520-6
pubmed: 19289430
Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 15;130:123-133
pubmed: 26853602
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Sep 7;61(17):6531-52
pubmed: 27524504
Med Phys. 2018 Dec;45(12):5659-5665
pubmed: 30341917
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
J Nucl Med. 2018 Oct;59(10):1630-1635
pubmed: 29496982
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jan;37(1):20-34
pubmed: 28436851
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):801-812
pubmed: 30108005
Phys Med Biol. 2011 May 21;56(10):3091-106
pubmed: 21508443
Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Apr;17(2):264-76
pubmed: 25096328
J Nucl Med. 2018 Oct;59(10):1624-1629
pubmed: 29449446
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jun 13;63(12):125011
pubmed: 29790857
Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):676-684
pubmed: 28925823
Med Phys. 2017 Apr;44(4):1408-1419
pubmed: 28192624
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Feb 21;57(4):885-99
pubmed: 22290428