A comparative study of the radial pulse between primary dysmenorrhea patients and healthy subjects during the menstrual phase.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 07 2019
04 07 2019
Historique:
received:
28
01
2019
accepted:
21
06
2019
entrez:
6
7
2019
pubmed:
6
7
2019
medline:
27
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare radial pulse characteristics between primary dysmenorrhea (PD) patients and healthy subjects throughout the menstrual cycle. A total of 48 females aged 20 to 29 years participated, and all subjects were assigned to two groups according to their visual analogue scale scores. The radial pulse of each subject was obtained using a pulse tonometric device during menstrual, follicular, and luteal phases. In addition, various pulse analysis indices were used to estimate the pulse characteristics. The pulse tension index (PTI) and pulse depth index (PDI) in the patient group were significantly lower than those in the healthy group during the menstrual phase (P < 0.01 and <0.001, respectively). According to univariate logistic regression results, the PTI, PDI and optimal applied pressure (OAP) were significantly correlated with PD, and the model based on the PTI and OAP performed best (AUC = 0.828). This study is the first to analyze pulse tension inferred from the PTI and to apply this parameter to clinical practice. The results of this study confirmed the possibility of quantitatively measuring pulse tension and suggest that the PTI and OAP can serve as potential clinical indicators for pain disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31273265
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46066-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-46066-2
pmc: PMC6609770
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9716Références
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:460386
pubmed: 25202332
Complement Ther Med. 2009 Jun;17(3):155-60
pubmed: 19398069
J Med Syst. 2010 Jun;34(3):331-9
pubmed: 20503618
Integr Med Res. 2013 Mar;2(1):7-17
pubmed: 28664048
Trials. 2012 Jan 05;13:3
pubmed: 22217258
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1134-8
pubmed: 16690671
F1000Res. 2017 Sep 5;6:1645
pubmed: 28944048
Lancet. 1997 Apr 19;349(9059):1116
pubmed: 9113008
Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):446-53
pubmed: 11202488
Health Psychol. 2001 Nov;20(6):411-6
pubmed: 11714182
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:385136
pubmed: 26495011
Med Eng Phys. 2009 Dec;31(10):1283-9
pubmed: 19747872
Trials. 2015 Jan 30;16:35
pubmed: 25633584
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jul;105(7):780-9
pubmed: 9692420
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 27;8(8):e73839
pubmed: 24013220
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1114-22
pubmed: 18951224
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:938641
pubmed: 24191173
J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Jun;15(6):645-52
pubmed: 19480601
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1083208
pubmed: 27579304
Int J Womens Health. 2017 May 16;9:323-330
pubmed: 28553145
J Behav Med. 1978 Sep;1(3):297-310
pubmed: 40034
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Jul 11;15:222
pubmed: 26162371
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:563958
pubmed: 21941587
Hypertension. 1994 Mar;23(3):395-401
pubmed: 8125567