Impaired Motor Skill Acquisition Using Mirror Visual Feedback Improved by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Parkinson’s disease mirror visual feedback neuroplasticity rehabilitation transcranial direct current stimulation

Journal

Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 17 10 2018
accepted: 27 05 2019
entrez: 6 7 2019
pubmed: 6 7 2019
medline: 6 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent non-invasive brain stimulation techniques in combination with motor training can enhance neuroplasticity and learning. It is reasonable to assume that such neuroplasticity-based interventions constitute a useful rehabilitative tool for patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). Regarding motor skill training, many kinds of tasks that do not involve real motor movements have been applied to PD patients. The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether motor skill training using mirror visual feedback (MVF) is useful to patients with PD in order to improve untrained hand performance dependent on the time course of training; and whether MVF combined with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) causes an additional effect based on increased motor cortical excitability. Eighteen right-handed patients with PD in the off-medication state and 10 age-matched healthy subjects (HS) performed four sessions of right-hand ball rotation using MVF (intervention) on two separate days, 1 week apart (day 1 and day 2). HS subjects received only sham stimulation. The intervention included four sessions of motor-skill training using MVF for 20 min comprised of four sets of training for 30 s each. PD patients were randomly divided into two intervention groups without or with anodal tDCS over the right M1 contralateral to the untrained hand. As the behavior evaluation, the number of ball rotations of the left hand was counted before (pre) and immediately after (post) intervention on both days (pre day 1, post day 1, pre day 2, and post day 2). Motor evoked potential (MEP), input-output function, and cortical silent period were recorded to evaluate the motor cortical excitatory and inhibitory system in M1 pre day 1 and post day 2. The number of ball rotations of the left hand and the facilitation of MEP by intervention were significantly impaired in patients with PD compared to HS. In contrast, if anodal tDCS was applied to right M1 of patients with PD, the number of ball rotations in accordance with I-O function at 150% intensity was significantly increased after day 1 and retained until day 2. This finding may help provide a new strategy for neurorehabilitation improving task-specific motor memory without real motor movements in PD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31275100
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00602
pmc: PMC6593084
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

602

Références

Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2035-6
pubmed: 10376620
J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9
pubmed: 10990547
Neurology. 2000 Oct 10;55(7):996-1002
pubmed: 11061258
Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6
pubmed: 11113214
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Oct;4(10):1020-5
pubmed: 11547338
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;114(4):600-4
pubmed: 12686268
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):619-26
pubmed: 12803972
Neurology. 1992 Oct;42(10):1951-9
pubmed: 1407578
Brain. 1992 Oct;115 ( Pt 5):1481-95
pubmed: 1422799
Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20 Suppl 1:S107-11
pubmed: 14597303
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;55(3):181-4
pubmed: 1564476
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;76(3):343-8
pubmed: 15716523
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):161-7
pubmed: 15831397
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50
pubmed: 16427357
Mov Disord. 2006 Oct;21(10):1693-702
pubmed: 16817194
Trends Neurosci. 1990 Jul;13(7):281-5
pubmed: 1695404
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 Dec;20(4):459-67
pubmed: 17082501
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Aug;81(4):257-62
pubmed: 1714819
Brain. 2007 Nov;130(Pt 11):2887-97
pubmed: 17855374
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(2):249-57
pubmed: 17926025
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):393-8
pubmed: 18295613
Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Aug;21(4):478-83
pubmed: 18607210
Neurology. 1991 Sep;41(9):1449-56
pubmed: 1891097
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):835-42
pubmed: 19138692
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1590-5
pubmed: 19164589
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 17;4(9):e7082
pubmed: 19759902
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;121(7):1129-37
pubmed: 20350836
Brain Stimul. 2008 Oct;1(4):363-9
pubmed: 20633394
Mov Disord. 2010 Oct 15;25(13):2148-55
pubmed: 20669182
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;81(10):1105-11
pubmed: 20870863
J Physiol. 2011 Jul 1;589(Pt 13):3053-4
pubmed: 21724583
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21669
pubmed: 21760898
Brain Stimul. 2011 Oct;4(4):253-60
pubmed: 22032740
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-92
pubmed: 22085959
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 25;32(4):1293-300
pubmed: 22279214
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 14;6:236
pubmed: 22912611
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(6):552-60
pubmed: 23392919
BMC Neurosci. 2013 Apr 02;14:43
pubmed: 23547559
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Nov;28(11):1115-24
pubmed: 24849794
Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Oct;10(10):597-608
pubmed: 25201238
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Apr 1;113(7):2383-9
pubmed: 25632079
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Jun;41(12):1614-23
pubmed: 25892447
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 May;41(11):1475-83
pubmed: 25912048
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Sep;18(9):1299-1309
pubmed: 26237365
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;87(4):345-55
pubmed: 26319437
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 23;10(9):e0138554
pubmed: 26397375
Parkinsons Dis. 2015;2015:124214
pubmed: 26495150
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 18;7:CD010916
pubmed: 27425786
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:8764238
pubmed: 27563470
Mov Disord. 2017 Oct;32(10):1474-1478
pubmed: 28895186
PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0196661
pubmed: 29847548
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Brain Res. 1983 Feb 21;261(2):312-6
pubmed: 6831213
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;91(2):79-92
pubmed: 7519144
Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):489-90
pubmed: 7566144
Mov Disord. 1994 May;9(3):311-4
pubmed: 8041371
Neurosci Lett. 1993 Jun 25;156(1-2):167-71
pubmed: 8414181
J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53
pubmed: 8463991
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):131-41
pubmed: 8713554
J Neurol Sci. 1996 Aug;139(2):218-26
pubmed: 8856656
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Sep;111(2):246-52
pubmed: 8891654
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Oct;105(5):340-4
pubmed: 9362997

Auteurs

Mitsuya Horiba (M)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Yoshino Ueki (Y)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Ippei Nojima (I)

Department of Physical Therapy, Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan.

Yoko Shimizu (Y)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Kento Sahashi (K)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Shogo Itamoto (S)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Ayuko Suzuki (A)

Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Gohei Yamada (G)

Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Noriyuki Matsukawa (N)

Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Ikuo Wada (I)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

Classifications MeSH