Integrated community case management: planning for sustainability in five African countries.
Journal
Journal of global health
ISSN: 2047-2986
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101578780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez:
6
7
2019
pubmed:
6
7
2019
medline:
12
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The World Health Organization (WHO) launched an initiative to plan for the sustainability of integrated community case management (iCCM) programmes supported by the Rapid Access Expansion (RAcE) Programme in five African countries in 2016. WHO contracted experts to facilitate sustainability planning among Ministries of Health, WHO, nongovernmental organisation grantees, and other stakeholders. We designed an iterative and unique process for each RAcE project area which involved creating a sustainability framework to guide planning; convening meetings to identify and prioritise elements of the framework; forming technical working groups to build country ownership; and, ultimately, creating roadmaps to guide efforts to fully transfer ownership of the iCCM programmes to host countries. For this analysis, we compared priorities identified in roadmaps across RAcE project sites, examined progress against roadmaps via transition plans, and produced recommendations for short-term actions based on roadmap priorities that were unaddressed or needed further attention. This article describes the sustainability planning process, roadmap priorities, progress against roadmaps, and recommendations made for each project area. We found a few patterns among the prioritised roadmap elements. Overall, every project area identified priorities related to policy and coordination of external stakeholders including funders; supply chain management; service delivery and referral system; and communication and social mobilisation, indicating that these factors have persisted despite iCCM programme maturity, and are also of concern to new programmes. We also found that a facilitated process to identify and document programme priorities in roadmaps, along with deliberately planning for transition from an external implementer to a national system could support the sustainability of iCCM programmes by facilitating teams of stakeholders to accomplish explicit tasks related to transitioning the programme. Certain common elements are of concern for sustaining iCCM programmes across countries, among them political leadership, supply chain management, data processes, human resources, and community engagement. Adapting and using a sustainability planning approach created an inclusive and comprehensive dialogue about systemic factors that influence the sustainability of iCCM services and facilitated changes to health systems in each country.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization (WHO) launched an initiative to plan for the sustainability of integrated community case management (iCCM) programmes supported by the Rapid Access Expansion (RAcE) Programme in five African countries in 2016. WHO contracted experts to facilitate sustainability planning among Ministries of Health, WHO, nongovernmental organisation grantees, and other stakeholders.
METHODS
METHODS
We designed an iterative and unique process for each RAcE project area which involved creating a sustainability framework to guide planning; convening meetings to identify and prioritise elements of the framework; forming technical working groups to build country ownership; and, ultimately, creating roadmaps to guide efforts to fully transfer ownership of the iCCM programmes to host countries. For this analysis, we compared priorities identified in roadmaps across RAcE project sites, examined progress against roadmaps via transition plans, and produced recommendations for short-term actions based on roadmap priorities that were unaddressed or needed further attention.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This article describes the sustainability planning process, roadmap priorities, progress against roadmaps, and recommendations made for each project area. We found a few patterns among the prioritised roadmap elements. Overall, every project area identified priorities related to policy and coordination of external stakeholders including funders; supply chain management; service delivery and referral system; and communication and social mobilisation, indicating that these factors have persisted despite iCCM programme maturity, and are also of concern to new programmes. We also found that a facilitated process to identify and document programme priorities in roadmaps, along with deliberately planning for transition from an external implementer to a national system could support the sustainability of iCCM programmes by facilitating teams of stakeholders to accomplish explicit tasks related to transitioning the programme.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Certain common elements are of concern for sustaining iCCM programmes across countries, among them political leadership, supply chain management, data processes, human resources, and community engagement. Adapting and using a sustainability planning approach created an inclusive and comprehensive dialogue about systemic factors that influence the sustainability of iCCM services and facilitated changes to health systems in each country.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31275567
doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010802
pii: jogh-09-010802
pmc: PMC6596361
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
010802Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: To the best of our knowledge, no authors have competing interests in relation to this article. We have tried to reach all authors, but some live and work in remote areas and were unable to respond by the time of the publication of this article. All other authors completed the ICMJE COI form (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflict of interest.
Références
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):117-23
pubmed: 18287916
Health Policy Plan. 2011 May;26(3):187-98
pubmed: 20823216
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 20;12:531
pubmed: 22818046
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):6-10
pubmed: 23136272
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):54-60
pubmed: 23136278
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):69-76
pubmed: 23136280
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):85-91
pubmed: 23136282
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):151-153
pubmed: 23136291
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 02;8:117
pubmed: 24088228
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Jul;19(7):872-82
pubmed: 24750516
J Glob Health. 2014 Dec;4(2):020401
pubmed: 25520791
J Glob Health. 2014 Dec;4(2):020404
pubmed: 25520794
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:147-55
pubmed: 25779620
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Jun 17;3(2):274-86
pubmed: 26085023
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Dec;30 Suppl 2:ii12-ii25
pubmed: 26516146
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Dec;30 Suppl 2:ii3-ii11
pubmed: 26516148
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Dec;30 Suppl 2:ii36-ii45
pubmed: 26516149
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Dec;30 Suppl 2:ii54-ii64
pubmed: 26516151
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Dec;30 Suppl 2:ii84-ii94
pubmed: 26516154
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Dec 17;3(4):591-605
pubmed: 26681706
Afr J AIDS Res. 2016;15(1):35-43
pubmed: 26785676
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Mar;94(3):571-573
pubmed: 26936992
Glob Public Health. 2017 Dec;12(12):1568-1578
pubmed: 27841079
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:150-157
pubmed: 28167340
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010403
pubmed: 28702174
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Feb;23(2):122-135
pubmed: 29160921
Glob Public Health. 2019 Apr;14(4):542-554
pubmed: 29616876
BMJ. 2018 Jul 30;362:k2989
pubmed: 30061099
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e019079
pubmed: 30061428