Home visits by community health workers for pregnant mothers and newborns: coverage plateau in Malawi.
Community Health Workers
Feasibility Studies
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Services Research
House Calls
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Malawi
Maternal Health Services
Maternal-Child Health Services
Pregnancy
World Health Organization
Journal
Journal of global health
ISSN: 2047-2986
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101578780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez:
6
7
2019
pubmed:
6
7
2019
medline:
12
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Home visits by community health workers (CHWs) during pregnancy and soon after delivery are recommended to improve newborn survival. However, as the roles of CHWs expand, there are concerns regarding the capacity of community health systems to deliver high effective coverage of home visits. The WHO's Rapid Access Expansion (RAcE) program supported the Malawi Ministry of Health to align their Community-Based Maternal and Newborn Care (CBMNC) package with the latest WHO guidelines and to implement and evaluate the feasibility and coverage of home visits in Ntcheu district. A population-based survey of 150 households in Ntcheu district was conducted in July-August 2016 after approximately 10 months of CBMNC implementation. Thirty clusters were selected proportional-to-size using the most recent census. In selected clusters, five households with mothers of children under six months of age were randomly selected for interview. The Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) providing community-based services to the same clusters were purposively selected for a structured interview and register review. Less than one third of pregnant women (30.7%; 95% confidence interval CI = 21.7%-41.5%) received a home visit during pregnancy and only 20.7% (95% CI = 13.0%-29.4%) received the recommended two visits. Coverage of postnatal visits was even lower: 11.4% (95%CI = 6.8%-18.5%) of mothers and newborns received a visit within three days of delivery and 20.7% (95%CI = 12.7%-32.0%) received a visit within the first eight days. Reaching newborns soon after delivery requires timely participation of the family and/or health facility staff to notify the HSA - yet only 42.9% (95% CI = 33.4%-52.9%) of mothers reported that the HSA was informed of the delivery. Coverage of postnatal home visits among those who informed the HSA was significantly higher than among those in which the HSA was not informed (46.7% compared to 1.3%; We found low coverage of home visits during pregnancy and soon after delivery in a well-supported program delivery environment. Most HSAs were conducting home visits, but not at the level needed to reach high coverage. These findings were similar to previous studies, calling into question the feasibility of the current visitation schedule. It is time to re-align the CBMNC package with what the existing platform can deliver and identify strategies to better support HSAs to implement home visits to those who would benefit most.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Home visits by community health workers (CHWs) during pregnancy and soon after delivery are recommended to improve newborn survival. However, as the roles of CHWs expand, there are concerns regarding the capacity of community health systems to deliver high effective coverage of home visits. The WHO's Rapid Access Expansion (RAcE) program supported the Malawi Ministry of Health to align their Community-Based Maternal and Newborn Care (CBMNC) package with the latest WHO guidelines and to implement and evaluate the feasibility and coverage of home visits in Ntcheu district.
METHODS
METHODS
A population-based survey of 150 households in Ntcheu district was conducted in July-August 2016 after approximately 10 months of CBMNC implementation. Thirty clusters were selected proportional-to-size using the most recent census. In selected clusters, five households with mothers of children under six months of age were randomly selected for interview. The Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) providing community-based services to the same clusters were purposively selected for a structured interview and register review.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Less than one third of pregnant women (30.7%; 95% confidence interval CI = 21.7%-41.5%) received a home visit during pregnancy and only 20.7% (95% CI = 13.0%-29.4%) received the recommended two visits. Coverage of postnatal visits was even lower: 11.4% (95%CI = 6.8%-18.5%) of mothers and newborns received a visit within three days of delivery and 20.7% (95%CI = 12.7%-32.0%) received a visit within the first eight days. Reaching newborns soon after delivery requires timely participation of the family and/or health facility staff to notify the HSA - yet only 42.9% (95% CI = 33.4%-52.9%) of mothers reported that the HSA was informed of the delivery. Coverage of postnatal home visits among those who informed the HSA was significantly higher than among those in which the HSA was not informed (46.7% compared to 1.3%;
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We found low coverage of home visits during pregnancy and soon after delivery in a well-supported program delivery environment. Most HSAs were conducting home visits, but not at the level needed to reach high coverage. These findings were similar to previous studies, calling into question the feasibility of the current visitation schedule. It is time to re-align the CBMNC package with what the existing platform can deliver and identify strategies to better support HSAs to implement home visits to those who would benefit most.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31275568
doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010808
pii: jogh-09.010808
pmc: PMC6596344
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
010808Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: The authors have completed the ICMJE Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no conflict of interest.
Références
J Perinatol. 2008 Sep;28(9):632-40
pubmed: 18596714
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Mar;94(3):574-583
pubmed: 26787158
Lancet. 2008 Jun 7;371(9628):1936-44
pubmed: 18539225
J Perinatol. 2016 May;36 Suppl 1:S74-82
pubmed: 27109094
Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1151-62
pubmed: 18926277
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(suppl_1):i64-i74
pubmed: 28981762
J Glob Health. 2019 Jun;9(1):010807
pubmed: 31263552
BMC Public Health. 2013 Nov 07;13:1052
pubmed: 24199832
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 11;13:55
pubmed: 23394591
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020502
pubmed: 29423179
Glob Health Action. 2015 Mar 31;8:23963
pubmed: 25843490
Glob Health Action. 2015 Sep 07;8:28515
pubmed: 26350434
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Nov;2(11):e635-44
pubmed: 25442688
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 17;8(7):e68930
pubmed: 23874816
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Jun;86(6):452-9
pubmed: 18568274
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010422
pubmed: 29977530