The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes.


Journal

BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 31 01 2019
revised: 26 04 2019
accepted: 30 04 2019
entrez: 6 7 2019
pubmed: 6 7 2019
medline: 4 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To determine if cochlear duct length and cochlear basal diameter, measured using routinely available radiology software, affect hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation with two different length electrodes. 55 patients who received a Med-El Flex electrode were retrospectively reviewed. 34 patients received the Flex 31 electrode (31mm) and 21 patients received the Flex 28 electrode (28mm). Preoperative high-resolution CT scans of the temporal bone were reformatted in the axial and coronal plane. The basal diameter of the cochlear (A-value) and the outer-wall lengths of the cochlear duct were measured using readily available imaging software. Postoperative plane X-rays were used to determine the degree of electrode insertion and the number of electrodes within the cochlea and speech discrimination scores at 6 months were evaluated. The cochlear metrics obtained were comparable with those previously published in the literature. There was no significant difference in the degree of insertion or speech outcomes between the two electrode lengths. However, when the group who had received the shorter electrode were analysed, there was an association seen between both cochlear duct length and cochlear diameter and speech outcomes. Cochlear size may be a factor in determining speech outcomes that cannot be explained solely by insertion depth or degrees of insertion. Further studies are required to determine if cochlear duct length is an independent predictor of speech outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31275978
doi: 10.1155/2019/5849871
pmc: PMC6582906
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5849871

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Références

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1999 Nov-Dec;61(6):334-40
pubmed: 10545807
Am J Otol. 2000 Jan;21(1):49-56
pubmed: 10651435
J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70
pubmed: 14485785
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May;130(5):624-8
pubmed: 15148187
Laryngoscope. 2004 Jul;114(7):1237-41
pubmed: 15235353
Laryngoscope. 2005 Apr;115(4):672-7
pubmed: 15805879
Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 May;125(5):474-80
pubmed: 16092536
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Aug;27(5):624-33
pubmed: 16868510
Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 Dec;126(11):1182-7
pubmed: 17050311
Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:27-33
pubmed: 17063008
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):220-33
pubmed: 17318276
Acta Otolaryngol. 1991;111(6):1037-40
pubmed: 1763623
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Feb;29(2):131-6
pubmed: 18090204
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Jan;30(1):14-22
pubmed: 18833017
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;30(7):1425-30
pubmed: 19386728
Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(5):323-31
pubmed: 20203481
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):411-27
pubmed: 21248642
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Sep;32(7):1086-93
pubmed: 21817935
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Dec;32(9):1448-54
pubmed: 22072260
Laryngoscope. 2012 Jan;122(1):190-5
pubmed: 22183635
Acta Otolaryngol. 2013 Dec;133(12):1258-65
pubmed: 24053486
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jan;35(1):e40-4
pubmed: 24080974
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jan;35(1):58-63
pubmed: 24335932
Hear Res. 2014 Oct;316:65-72
pubmed: 25124151
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Mar;37(3):223-8
pubmed: 26837001
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Mar;38(3):339-346
pubmed: 28146009
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 7;46(1):19
pubmed: 28270200
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Feb;275(2):385-394
pubmed: 29242990
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99
pubmed: 8132902
HNO. 1993 Jul;41(7):356-9
pubmed: 8376183
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996 Sep;105(9):701-9
pubmed: 8800056
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1998 Nov;175:1-16
pubmed: 9826942
Am J Otol. 1999 Jan;20(1):53-5
pubmed: 9918173

Auteurs

Jafri Kuthubutheen (J)

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia.

Amandeep Grewal (A)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto M4N3M5, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada.

Sean Symons (S)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto M4N3M5, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada.

Julian Nedzelski (J)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto M4N3M5, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada.

David Shipp (D)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto M4N3M5, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada.

Vincent Lin (V)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto M4N3M5, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada.

Joseph Chen (J)

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto M4N3M5, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH