Prevalence and risk indicators of gingival recessions in an Italian school of dentistry and dental hygiene: a cross-sectional study.
Epidemiology
Gingival recessions
Prevalence
Risk indicators
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
04
12
2018
accepted:
28
06
2019
pubmed:
7
7
2019
medline:
28
2
2020
entrez:
7
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this cross-sectional study is to (i) determine the prevalence, extent, severity, and distribution of gingival recessions and patient perception in a young population and (ii) to identify potential risk indicators. Two hundred fifty-one students with a mean age of 22.9 ± 4.7, attending the School of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene of Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (Milan, Italy) were included. The subjects had undergone a clinical evaluation, by two calibrated examiner, and a questionnaire. Demographic and clinical data were collected to evaluate association of these factors with gingival recessions. The prevalence of gingival recessions at patient and tooth level was 39% and 5.2%, respectively. The only factor associated with the presence of GR was age. On the other hand, age and smoking were associated with the extent, whereas BOP, NCCLs and KT were associated with the severity. Out of 98 subjects presenting at least one GR, 63 (64%) were conscious of the presence of the GR. NCCLs were also strongly associated with the perception of the recession by the patient. There is a low prevalence of buccal gingival recessions in this sample of Italian students. More than 50% of the sample was aware of the problem. Almost all patients presenting symptomatology or aesthetic concern requested appropriate therapy. The findings highlight the low relevance of gingival recessions in daily practice and the importance of controlling potential risk indicators in young populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31278617
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02996-9
pii: 10.1007/s00784-019-02996-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
991-1000Références
Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 May;7(2):115-20
pubmed: 19413547
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 May;26(5):276-80
pubmed: 10355616
J Periodontol. 1989 Nov;60(11):599-603
pubmed: 2600746
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jun;40(6):631-7
pubmed: 23587032
J Periodontol. 2010 Oct;81(10):1419-25
pubmed: 20476890
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Apr;40(4):319-26
pubmed: 23425194
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Nov;41(11):1098-107
pubmed: 25164479
J Periodontol. 2004 Jul;75(7):1033-41
pubmed: 15341364
J Clin Periodontol. 1994 Jan;21(1):57-63
pubmed: 8126246
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jul;40(7):707-12
pubmed: 23668251
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Dec;38(12):1091-8
pubmed: 22092502
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S237-S248
pubmed: 29926943
J Dent. 2018 Sep;76:93-97
pubmed: 29940290
J Periodontol. 1999 Jan;70(1):30-43
pubmed: 10052768
Int Dent J. 2003 Apr;53(2):67-72
pubmed: 12731692
J Periodontol. 1993 Sep;64(9):900-5
pubmed: 8229627
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Oct;34(10):860-6
pubmed: 17850604
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Dec;30(6):573-81
pubmed: 20967303
J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Dec;34(12):1046-61
pubmed: 17953693
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):652-6
pubmed: 18984397