Innate Immune Genes Associated With Newcastle Disease Virus Load in Chick Embryos From Inbred and Outbred Lines.

Newcastle disease virus Tanzanian ecotypes chick embryo innate immunity susceptibility

Journal

Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 30 04 2019
accepted: 06 06 2019
entrez: 9 7 2019
pubmed: 10 7 2019
medline: 10 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Newcastle disease virus (NDV) causes substantial economic losses to smallholder farmers in low- and middle-income countries with high levels of morbidity and mortality in poultry flocks. Previous investigations have suggested differing levels of susceptibility to NDV between specific inbred lines and amongst breeds of chickens, however, the mechanisms contributing to this remain poorly understood. Studies have shown that some of these differences in levels of susceptibility to NDV infection may be accounted for by variability in the innate immune response amongst various breeds of poultry to NDV infection. Recent studies, in inbred Fayoumi and Leghorn lines, uncovered conserved, breed-dependent, and subline-dependent responses. To better understand the role of innate immune genes in engendering a protective immune response, we assessed the transcriptional responses to NDV of three highly outbred Tanzanian local chicken ecotypes, the Kuchi, the Morogoro Medium, and the Ching'wekwe. Hierarchical clustering and principal coordinate analysis of the gene expression profiles of 21-day old chick embryos infected with NDV clustered in an ecotype-dependent manner and was consistent with the relative viral loads for each of the three ecotypes. The Kuchi and Morogoro Medium exhibit significantly higher viral loads than the Ching'wekwe. The results show that the outbred ecotypes with increased levels of expression of CCL4, NOS2, and SOCS1 also had higher viral loads. The higher expression of SOCS1 is inconsistent with the expression in inbred lines. These differences may uncover new mechanisms or pathways in these populations that may have otherwise been overlooked when examining the response in highly inbred lines. Taken together, our findings provide insights on the specific conserved and differentially expressed innate immune-related genes involved the response of highly outbred chicken lines to NDV. This also suggests that several of the specific innate immunity related genes identified in the current investigation may serve as markers for the selection of chickens with reduced susceptibility to NDV.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31281305
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01432
pmc: PMC6596324
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1432

Références

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2001 Jul;33(4):341-54
pubmed: 11474868
Poult Sci. 2003 Feb;82(2):259-66
pubmed: 12619803
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):329-38
pubmed: 14715773
Infect Immun. 2005 Aug;73(8):5173-82
pubmed: 16041035
Infect Immun. 2006 Feb;74(2):1425-30
pubmed: 16428798
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009 Jan;41(1):51-9
pubmed: 19052902
J Gen Virol. 2011 Apr;92(Pt 4):931-9
pubmed: 21177922
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 19;6(1):e14561
pubmed: 21283521
Avian Pathol. 2012;41(4):329-35
pubmed: 22834545
Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Dec;39(12):10957-70
pubmed: 23065264
Dev Comp Immunol. 2013 Nov;41(3):447-53
pubmed: 23623955
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Jul;25(7):1038-44
pubmed: 25049661
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Oct;28(10):1496-511
pubmed: 26323406
Poult Sci. 2016 Apr;95(4):912-9
pubmed: 26908883
Vet Microbiol. 2017 Jul;206:126-136
pubmed: 28024856
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172812
pubmed: 28234989
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017 May 5;24(5):null
pubmed: 28331077
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 13;7(1):17485
pubmed: 29235573
BMC Genomics. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):989
pubmed: 29281979
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 19;8(1):1278
pubmed: 29352240
Front Genet. 2018 Feb 27;9:61
pubmed: 29535762
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 26;8(1):6558
pubmed: 29700338
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0206058
pubmed: 30356260
Poult Sci. 2019 Jul 1;98(7):2734-2746
pubmed: 30877744
Sci Rep. 2019 May 10;9(1):7209
pubmed: 31076577
Avian Dis. 1997 Oct-Dec;41(4):856-63
pubmed: 9454919

Auteurs

Megan A Schilling (MA)

Animal Science Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
School of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, TZ, United States.

Sahar Memari (S)

Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Isabella M Cattadori (IM)

Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Applied Biological and Biosecurity Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Robab Katani (R)

Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Applied Biological and Biosecurity Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Amandus P Muhairwa (AP)

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, TZ, United States.

Joram J Buza (JJ)

School of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, TZ, United States.

Vivek Kapur (V)

Animal Science Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
School of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, TZ, United States.
Applied Biological and Biosecurity Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Classifications MeSH