A Feasibility Study on the Use of Equine Chondrogenic Induced Mesenchymal Stem Cells as a Treatment for Natural Occurring Osteoarthritis in Dogs.
Journal
Stem cells international
ISSN: 1687-966X
Titre abrégé: Stem Cells Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535822
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
29
10
2018
revised:
21
02
2019
accepted:
27
02
2019
entrez:
9
7
2019
pubmed:
10
7
2019
medline:
10
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Conventional treatments of osteoarthritis (OA) reduce pain and the inflammatory response but do not repair the damaged cartilage. Xenogeneic peripheral blood-derived equine chondrogenically induced mesenchymal stem cells (ciMSC) could thus provide an interesting alternative. Six client-owned dogs with confirmed elbow OA were subjected to a baseline orthopedic examination, pressure plate analysis, general clinical examination, hematological analysis, synovial fluid sampling, and radiographic examination, and their owners completed two surveys. After all examinations, a 0.9% saline solution (placebo control product = CP) was administered intra-articularly. After 6 weeks, all examinations were repeated, owners again completed two surveys, and equine ciMSCs were administered in the same joint. After another 6 weeks, dogs were returned for a final follow-up. No serious adverse events or suspected adverse drug reactions were present during this study. No significant differences in blood analysis were noted between the CP and ciMSC treatment. Two adverse events were observed, both in the same dog, one after CP treatment and one after ciMSC treatment. The owner surveys revealed significantly less pain and lameness after ciMSC treatment compared to after CP treatment. There was no significant difference in the orthopedic examination parameters, the radiographic examination, synovial fluid sampling, and pressure plate analysis between CP treatment and ciMSC treatment. A single intra-articular administration of equine ciMSCs proved to be a well-tolerated treatment, which reduced lameness and pain according to the owner's evaluations compared to a placebo treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31281373
doi: 10.1155/2019/4587594
pmc: PMC6589207
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4587594Références
Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2004 May;19(2):68-74
pubmed: 15179926
Am J Vet Res. 2004 Dec;65(12):1634-43
pubmed: 15631027
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Jul;4(7):371-80
pubmed: 18477997
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010 Feb;16(1):105-15
pubmed: 19831641
Regen Med. 2010 Jan;5(1):121-43
pubmed: 20017699
Organogenesis. 2009 Jul;5(3):143-54
pubmed: 20046678
Cell Biol Int. 2012 Feb;36(2):189-94
pubmed: 21936851
Stem Cells Dev. 2012 Oct 10;21(15):2770-8
pubmed: 22621212
Vet J. 2013 Jan;195(1):107-13
pubmed: 22717781
BMC Vet Res. 2013 Jul 02;9:131
pubmed: 23819757
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2013;26(6):453-60
pubmed: 24080668
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013 Nov 15;156(1-2):99-106
pubmed: 24094688
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e85917
pubmed: 24465787
Vox Sang. 2014 Nov;107(4):315-23
pubmed: 24930636
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jul 01;10:143
pubmed: 24984756
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013 Apr;26(4):588-95
pubmed: 25049827
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Jul 31;15(8):13437-60
pubmed: 25089877
Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;9(6):497-503
pubmed: 25175766
Stem Cells Int. 2014;2014:391274
pubmed: 25180040
World J Transplant. 2014 Sep 24;4(3):196-205
pubmed: 25346893
Cell Transplant. 2015;24(10):1969-80
pubmed: 25375819
Vet J. 2014 Dec;202(3):416-24
pubmed: 25457267
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015 Apr 12;6:54
pubmed: 25889095
Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;11(1):78-93
pubmed: 26201864
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jan 15;11:9
pubmed: 26768536
J Orthop Res. 2016 Oct;34(10):1772-1779
pubmed: 26867692
Front Immunol. 2016 Sep 27;7:392
pubmed: 27729913
Equine Vet J. 2017 Jul;49(4):539-544
pubmed: 27862236
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3550-3563
pubmed: 29099618
Front Immunol. 2017 Nov 06;8:1465
pubmed: 29163532
Res Vet Sci. 2018 Apr;117:246-254
pubmed: 29329028