Treatment compliance and adherence among patients with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration treated by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor under universal health coverage.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Diabetic Retinopathy
/ diagnosis
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Insurance Coverage
Intravitreal Injections
Macula Lutea
/ pathology
Macular Degeneration
/ diagnosis
Male
Patient Compliance
Ranibizumab
/ administration & dosage
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
/ administration & dosage
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
/ administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
Age-related macular degeneration
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor
Compliance
Diabetic retinopathy
Loss to follow-up
Risk factors
Universal health coverage
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
01
05
2019
accepted:
02
07
2019
revised:
25
06
2019
pubmed:
10
7
2019
medline:
23
1
2020
entrez:
10
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To analyze and compare loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates between patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and those with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in patients, receiving treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), under universal health coverage. We retrospectively analyzed the relevant data of 1264 patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy, in this cohort study. The observation period ranged from September 01, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Intervals between each procedure and the subsequent follow-up examination were measured. Demographic data, visual acuity (VA), the type of transport for treatment access, and distance between the residence and clinic were evaluated as risk factors for LTFU. We collected data for 841 patients with nAMD (age, 81.0 (± 8.1 years)) and 423 patients with DR (age, 67.7 (± 12.1 years)). The rate of LTFU, for at least 6 months, was 28.8% and 2.9% for patients with DR and nAMD, respectively (p < 0.001). In the DR group, 18.9% patients were lost to follow-up exceeding > 12 months. Multivariate regression analysis showed that advanced age, lack of mobility, and need for assisted transport, poor final VA despite treatment, and decrease in vision during the observational period were independent risk factors for LTFU exceeding 12 months (p < 0.05). We found a high long-term LTFU rate for patients with DR, despite treatment under universal health coverage. Considering the risk of disease progression, particularly in patients with chronic DR, strategies for better compliance and adherence to therapy should be considered for optimized patient care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31286206
doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04414-y
pii: 10.1007/s00417-019-04414-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
aflibercept
15C2VL427D
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EC 2.7.10.1
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2119-2125Références
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Aug;67(2):124-32
pubmed: 18375141
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015 Sep;38(7):620-7
pubmed: 25913443
Med J Aust. 2005 Oct 3;183(7):366-8
pubmed: 16201955
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jun;36(6):1562-8
pubmed: 23275374
Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2293-2300
pubmed: 29068914
Diabetes Care. 2009 Dec;32(12):2307-13
pubmed: 19940227
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jan;62(1):76-87
pubmed: 17983433
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):361-72
pubmed: 15762896
Diabet Med. 2002 Oct;19(10):810-3
pubmed: 12358866
JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2137-2146
pubmed: 26565927
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e019989
pubmed: 29654021
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 29;366(13):1227-39
pubmed: 22455417
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;131(4):499-506
pubmed: 23710504
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;20(5):281-7
pubmed: 23662945
Surv Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):348-58
pubmed: 23664105
Retina. 2008 Feb;28(2):195-200
pubmed: 18301023
Ophthalmology. 2018 Sep;125(9):1386-1392
pubmed: 29606377
Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1254-64
pubmed: 18801858
Ophthalmology. 2019 Mar;126(3):407-413
pubmed: 30077614
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;101(1):75-80
pubmed: 27965262
BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 19;6:259
pubmed: 17052356
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 May;251(5):1281-4
pubmed: 23086225
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 1;136(11):1251-1259
pubmed: 30352121
Ir J Med Sci. 2008 Dec;177(4):303-8
pubmed: 18641918
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 17;15(1):73
pubmed: 28412945
Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2193-2203
pubmed: 28494920
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001 Oct;26(5):331-42
pubmed: 11679023