Eye fluke (Tylodelphys clavata) infection impairs visual ability and hampers foraging success in European perch.
Eye fluke
Foraging behavior
Host-parasite interaction
Intraspecific competition
Perca fluviatilis
Prey preference
Tylodelphys clavata
Journal
Parasitology research
ISSN: 1432-1955
Titre abrégé: Parasitol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8703571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
19
12
2018
accepted:
27
06
2019
pubmed:
10
7
2019
medline:
14
11
2019
entrez:
10
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Visual performance and environmental conditions can influence both behavioral patterns and predator-prey interactions of fish. Eye parasites can impair their host's sensory performance with important consequences for the detection of prey, predators, and conspecifics. We used European perch (Perca fluviatilis) experimentally infected with the eye fluke Tylodelphys clavata and evaluated their feeding behavior and competitive ability under competition with non-infected conspecifics, in groups of four individuals, for two different prey species (Asellus aquaticus and Daphnia magna). To test whether the effect of T. clavata infection differs at different light conditions, we performed the experiments at two light intensities (600 and 6 lx). Foraging efficiency of perch was significantly affected by infection but not by light intensity. The distance at which infected fish attacked both prey species was significantly shorter in comparison to non-infected conspecifics. Additionally, infected fish more often unsuccessfully attacked A. aquaticus. Although the outcome of competition depended on prey species, there was a general tendency that non-infected fish consumed more of the available prey under both light intensities. Even though individual prey preferences for either A. aquaticus or D. magna were observed, we could not detect that infected fish change their prey preference to compensate for a reduced competitive foraging ability. As infection of T. clavata impairs foraging efficiency and competitive ability, infected fish would need to spend more time foraging to attain similar food intake as non-infected conspecifics; this presumably increases predation risk and potentially enhances transmission success to the final host.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31286263
doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06389-5
pii: 10.1007/s00436-019-06389-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2531-2541Références
Parasitology. 2001;122 Suppl:S13-22
pubmed: 11442192
Parasite. 2007 Mar;14(1):39-51
pubmed: 17432056
Vision Res. 2008 Jun;48(13):1503-8
pubmed: 18471852
J Fish Biol. 2010 May;76(7):1848-55
pubmed: 20557636
Parasitology. 2016 Sep;143(10):1261-7
pubmed: 27216502
Behav Processes. 2017 Aug;141(Pt 2):205-219
pubmed: 27894933
Parasitol Res. 2017 Jun;116(6):1653-1663
pubmed: 28386680
Parasitol Res. 2017 Sep;116(9):2561-2567
pubmed: 28748304
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2018 Jan 31;7(1):68-74
pubmed: 29988817
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2018 May 06;7(2):171-179
pubmed: 29988865
Int J Parasitol. 1995 Dec;25(12):1371-83
pubmed: 8719948