In Vitro Evaluation of Resistance and Warming Performance of a Small Blood Warmer on a Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Circuit.
Blood warmer
Children
Extracorporeal device
Hypothermia
Journal
Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy
ISSN: 1744-9987
Titre abrégé: Ther Apher Dial
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101181252
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
31
05
2019
revised:
01
07
2019
accepted:
03
07
2019
pubmed:
11
7
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
11
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Children on extracorporeal devices are at increased risk of hypothermia and require circuits with lower extracorporeal volume to avoid blood priming. We performed an in vitro study of the enFlow blood warmer to assess its warming performance and impact on circuit resistance at a high blood flow rate. The enFlow was added on the return line of a continuous renal replacement therapy circuit in a closed circuit primed with expired packed red blood cells (40% Hct). Return venous pressure and temperature pre- and post- both enFlow and Prismaflo II were measured at varying blood flow with different combination of the two blood warmers. Each variable was recorded eight times over 2 min. Return venous pressure was higher with the enFlow but was still within clinically usable range (127.5 ± 4.6 vs. 45.3 ± 1.4 mm Hg at 200 mL/min, P < 0.05). The enFlow was able to achieve post-warmer temperature between 34.1 and 35.2°C even at 200 mL/min with blood, lower than what was observed with crystalloid, but still more effective than the Prismaflo II (P < 0.05 vs. enFlow post-warmer temperature) achieving between 32.8 and 34.0°C. Combining both warmers achieved a higher post-warmer temperature between 35.1 and 36.5°C. The enFlow can warm blood at high flow rates with minimal extracorporeal volume increase (~5 mL) and improve hypothermia prevention but may have resistance issues at the highest flows. The use of this device could benefit pediatric practice where smaller extracorporeal volumes are needed and patients are at increased risk of hypothermia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31290263
doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.13349
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
197-201Subventions
Organisme : Vyaire Medical
Informations de copyright
© 2019 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.
Références
Goldstein SL. Advances in pediatric renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury. Semin Dial 2011;24:187-91.
Goldstein SL. Continuous renal replacement therapy: mechanism of clearance, fluid removal, indications and outcomes. Curr Opin Pediatr 2011;23:181-5.
Askenazi D, Ingram D, White S et al. Smaller circuits for smaller patients: improving renal support therapy with Aquadex™. Pediatr Nephrol 2017;31:853-60.
Kim HJ, Yoo SM, Jung JS, Lee SH, Sun K, Son HS. The laboratory performance of the enFLOW®, buddy lite™ and ThermoSens® fluid warmers. Anaesthesia 2015;70:205-8.
Lehavi A, Yitzhak A, Jarassy R, Heizler R, Katz YS, Raz A. Comparison of the performance of battery-operated fluid warmers. Emerg Med J 2018;35:564-70.