Assessment of Students' Perception of the Nutrition Curriculum in a Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education Program.
Curriculum
Nutrition
Undergraduate medical education
Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
ISSN: 2515-2092
Titre abrégé: J Can Assoc Gastroenterol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101738684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
entrez:
12
7
2019
pubmed:
12
7
2019
medline:
12
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nutrition plays an important role in diseases, and physicians need to be proficient in providing nutrition counselling to patients. There is limited information regarding nutrition education in Canadian medical schools. The objective of this study was to investigate students' perspectives about nutrition training provided in the undergraduate medical education program at Dalhousie University. All medical students in their second, third, and fourth years of training at Dalhousie University were surveyed online with a 23-item questionnaire that included 10 nutrition competencies. Of 342 students, 89 (26%) completed the survey. Using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one, indicating 'very dissatisfied/strongly disagree' to five, indicating 'very satisfied/strongly agree,' the mean overall satisfaction with nutrition curriculum was 2.9 ± 0.81. Perceived competency in nutrition assessment had the highest mean satisfaction rating (3.98 ± 0.89). There was more variance on perceived competency, with other aspects of training including basic nutrition principles (3.51 ± 0.92), disease prevention (3.14 ± 1.12), disease management (3.48 ± 1.00), role of dietitians (2.97 ± 1.05), credible nutrition sources (3.14 ± 1.09), dietary assessment (2.82 ± 1.11), lifecycle nutrition (2.67 ± 1.09), food security (2.4 ± 0.95) and malnutrition (2.74 ± 0.93). Med-4 students agreed significantly more than Med-2 students regarding confidence about their understanding of the role of dietitians. Students recommended a longitudinal nutrition program, inclusion of dietitians as educators, and provision of evidence-based resources in the curriculum. The majority (79%) agreed that more nutrition instruction is needed. Satisfaction with nutrition education has not improved since 2010, despite curricular changes. Medical students' satisfaction with nutrition education remains problematic. They want more nutrition training. Ongoing assessment and student feedback is important to make changes and improvements in the nutrition curriculum.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nutrition plays an important role in diseases, and physicians need to be proficient in providing nutrition counselling to patients. There is limited information regarding nutrition education in Canadian medical schools.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to investigate students' perspectives about nutrition training provided in the undergraduate medical education program at Dalhousie University.
METHODS
METHODS
All medical students in their second, third, and fourth years of training at Dalhousie University were surveyed online with a 23-item questionnaire that included 10 nutrition competencies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 342 students, 89 (26%) completed the survey. Using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from one, indicating 'very dissatisfied/strongly disagree' to five, indicating 'very satisfied/strongly agree,' the mean overall satisfaction with nutrition curriculum was 2.9 ± 0.81. Perceived competency in nutrition assessment had the highest mean satisfaction rating (3.98 ± 0.89). There was more variance on perceived competency, with other aspects of training including basic nutrition principles (3.51 ± 0.92), disease prevention (3.14 ± 1.12), disease management (3.48 ± 1.00), role of dietitians (2.97 ± 1.05), credible nutrition sources (3.14 ± 1.09), dietary assessment (2.82 ± 1.11), lifecycle nutrition (2.67 ± 1.09), food security (2.4 ± 0.95) and malnutrition (2.74 ± 0.93). Med-4 students agreed significantly more than Med-2 students regarding confidence about their understanding of the role of dietitians. Students recommended a longitudinal nutrition program, inclusion of dietitians as educators, and provision of evidence-based resources in the curriculum. The majority (79%) agreed that more nutrition instruction is needed. Satisfaction with nutrition education has not improved since 2010, despite curricular changes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Medical students' satisfaction with nutrition education remains problematic. They want more nutrition training. Ongoing assessment and student feedback is important to make changes and improvements in the nutrition curriculum.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31294377
doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy043
pii: gwy043
pmc: PMC6619412
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
141-147Références
J Am Coll Nutr. 1999 Feb;18(1):26-9
pubmed: 10067655
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Jun;73(6):1107-12
pubmed: 11382667
J Nutr. 2003 Feb;133(2):567S-72S
pubmed: 12566504
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 May;77(5):1330-6
pubmed: 12716690
Eat Behav. 2002 Spring;3(1):1-13
pubmed: 15001017
Nutr J. 2005 Jan 13;4:2
pubmed: 15649324
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;83(4):941S-944S
pubmed: 16600952
Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;20(8):527-30
pubmed: 16955149
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Sep;84(3):655-62
pubmed: 16960182
Prev Med. 2007 Jan;44(1):76-81
pubmed: 16978687
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10):970-8
pubmed: 17895662
Fam Med. 2007 Nov-Dec;39(10):730-5
pubmed: 17987416
J Am Coll Nutr. 2008 Apr;27(2):287-98
pubmed: 18689561
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;43(6):559-64
pubmed: 19384248
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010 Jun;35(3):336-43
pubmed: 20555378
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1537-42
pubmed: 20736683
Nutr Clin Pract. 2010 Oct;25(5):471-80
pubmed: 20962306
Can J Public Health. 2010 Sep-Oct;101(5):390-5
pubmed: 21214054
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Aug 12;11:58
pubmed: 21835040
Adv Nutr. 2013 Jan 01;4(1):1-7
pubmed: 23319117
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013 Jul;37(4):482-97
pubmed: 23736864
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Dec;1306:21-40
pubmed: 24329516
Nutr Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;29(3):332-7
pubmed: 24690613
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):841-2
pubmed: 24733421
BMC Med Educ. 2014 May 29;14:109
pubmed: 24885676
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014 May 21;7:209-15
pubmed: 24899813
Glob Health Action. 2014 Jul 30;7:24827
pubmed: 25084833
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014 Nov;14(4):e551-5
pubmed: 25364560
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Feb 17;6:127-33
pubmed: 25733949
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016 Oct;15:69-74
pubmed: 28531787
J Am Coll Nutr. 1988 Jun;7(3):193-7
pubmed: 3392354
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Apr 1;130(7):851-3
pubmed: 6704837