Accurate expression of PD-L1/L2 in lung adenocarcinoma cells: A retrospective study by double immunohistochemistry.
Adenocarcinoma of Lung
/ drug therapy
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ pharmacology
B7-H1 Antigen
/ analysis
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
/ methods
Lung
/ cytology
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Macrophages
/ drug effects
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Protein
/ analysis
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
PD-L1
PD-L2
lung adenocarcinoma
macrophage
tumor proportion score
Journal
Cancer science
ISSN: 1349-7006
Titre abrégé: Cancer Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168776
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2019
revised:
07
07
2019
accepted:
09
07
2019
pubmed:
12
7
2019
medline:
1
10
2019
entrez:
12
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The percentage of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity in cancer cells, named as the tumor proportion score, is considered to be a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in lung cancer. PD-L1 is expressed on not only cancer cells but also on immune cells, including macrophages. Although previous studies related to PD-L1/2 expression in cancer tissues have been generally based on single immunohistochemistry (IHC), in the present study, we attempted to evaluate accurate PD-L1/2 expression in cancer cells in lung adenocarcinoma cells using double IHC to also evaluate macrophages. Of the 231 patients, PD-L1 expression was negative in 169 patients (73.2%), 1%-49% positive in 47 patients (20.3%), and ≥50% positive in 15 patients (6.5%). Interestingly, PD-L1 positivity was decreased when using double IHC compared with the estimation by single IHC. High PD-L1 expression was associated with high-grade cancer cells and in higher stage cancer. PD-L2 was negative in 109 patients (47.2%), 1%-49% positive in 50 patients (21.6%), and ≥50% positive in 72 patients (31.2%). The number of PD-L2-positive patients was increased in cases that had an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and in lower stage cancer. Thirty-five patients (15.2%) were positive for both PD-L1 and PD-L2, whereas 81 patients (35.1%) were negative for both PD-L1 and PD-L2. Log-rank analysis showed that progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly the longest in the PD-L1-negative and PD-L2-positive groups (P < .0001 and P = .0120). We observed lower PD-L1 or PD-L2 expression in lung adenocarcinoma than previously reported. Double IHC for macrophages may help clinicians to evaluate PD-L1 or PD-L2 expression specifically in cancer cells.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31294893
doi: 10.1111/cas.14128
pmc: PMC6726681
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CD274 protein, human
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
PDCD1LG2 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 Protein
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2711-2721Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 16H05162
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 16K15503
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 May 1;25(9):2691-2698
pubmed: 30642913
Histopathology. 2018 Feb;72(3):449-459
pubmed: 28851100
J Clin Pathol. 2019 Jun;72(6):412-417
pubmed: 30846480
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 08;8(3):
pubmed: 30857126
Cancer Sci. 2019 Jan;110(1):310-320
pubmed: 30426611
Ther Drug Monit. 2018 Feb;40(1):9-16
pubmed: 29084031
JCI Insight. 2018 Nov 2;3(21):
pubmed: 30385717
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
Cancer Biol Med. 2016 Jun;13(2):157-70
pubmed: 27458525
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1916-1924
pubmed: 30815801
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):874-881
pubmed: 28168303
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
Cancer Sci. 2016 Nov;107(11):1696-1704
pubmed: 27564404
Blood Adv. 2019 Feb 26;3(4):531-540
pubmed: 30770362
Cancer Sci. 2019 Sep;110(9):2711-2721
pubmed: 31294893
Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265
pubmed: 27979383
Clin Lung Cancer. 2019 Mar;20(2):e195-e207
pubmed: 30514666
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2017;57(1):31-36
pubmed: 28679964
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;59:199-207
pubmed: 30831552
BMC Urol. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):8
pubmed: 28086852
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
Cancer Sci. 2017 Sep;108(9):1719-1725
pubmed: 28627735
Lung Cancer. 2018 Dec;126:9-14
pubmed: 30527198
Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46
pubmed: 26970723
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 14;20(4):
pubmed: 30769852
Transl Res. 2018 Dec;202:129-145
pubmed: 30401465
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407