Perspectives on ICD-11 to understand and improve mental health diagnosis using expertise by experience (INCLUDE Study): an international qualitative study.
Anxiety Disorders
/ classification
Bipolar Disorder
/ classification
Depressive Disorder
/ classification
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Focus Groups
/ methods
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
India
/ epidemiology
International Classification of Diseases
/ standards
Male
Mental Disorders
/ classification
Mental Health Services
/ organization & administration
Personality Disorders
/ classification
Schizophrenia
/ classification
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
United States
/ epidemiology
World Health Organization
/ organization & administration
Journal
The lancet. Psychiatry
ISSN: 2215-0374
Titre abrégé: Lancet Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101638123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
09
01
2019
revised:
05
02
2019
accepted:
07
02
2019
pubmed:
13
7
2019
medline:
12
11
2019
entrez:
13
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Developed in collaboration with WHO Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, this study (conducted in India, the UK, and the USA) integrated feedback from mental health service users into the development of the chapter on mental, behavioural, and neurodevelopmental disorders for ICD-11. The ICD-11 will be used for health reporting from January, 2022. As a reporting standard and diagnostic classification system, ICD-11 will be highly influential by informing policy, clinical practice, and research that affect mental health service users. We report here the first study to systematically seek and collate service user perspectives on a major classification and diagnostic guideline. Focus groups were used to collect feedback on five diagnoses: depressive episode, generalised anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar type 1 disorder, and personality disorder. Participants were given the official draft diagnostic guidelines and a parallel lay translation. Data were then thematically analysed, forming the basis of co-produced recommendations for WHO, which included features that could be added or revised to better reflect lived experience and changes to language that was confusing or objectionable to service users. The findings indicated that an accessible lay language version of the ICD-11 could be beneficial for service users and their supporters.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31296444
pii: S2215-0366(19)30093-8
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30093-8
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
778-785Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.