Understanding stillbirth stigma: A scoping literature review.


Journal

Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives
ISSN: 1878-1799
Titre abrégé: Women Birth
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101266131

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2020
Historique:
received: 19 12 2018
revised: 15 04 2019
accepted: 12 05 2019
pubmed: 13 7 2019
medline: 9 9 2020
entrez: 13 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The World Health Organization, and the 2011 and 2016 Lancet Stillbirth series as well as medical and scientific literature, have all called for stillbirth stigma to be reduced. However, few studies have explored or attempted to conceptualise the meaning of stigma in the context of stillbirth. To explore the current knowledge surrounding stillbirth stigma, specifically the extent, type and experiences of bereaved parents. A five-stage scoping review framework was utilised. A search of relevant databases (MedLine, EMBASE, PsychInfo, PsychArticles, and Ovid Emcare) was undertaken with several key words related to 'stillbirth' and 'stigma.' The reference lists of included studies were also searched. A total of 23 resources met the inclusion criteria for this review. A thematic analysis regarding how stigma was conceptualised and/or experienced within results and/or discussion was employed on these studies. Five over-arching themes, with several sub-themes, were discovered: Type of stigma, identity, silence, bereaved mothers' experiences of stigma in low-income countries and transformation. Stillbirth stigma remains an under-researched topic. Few articles conceptualised the experiences of the bereaved parent within a stigma framework. However, examples of bereaved parents enduring stigma were found within the literature. Common stigmatising experiences included, bereaved parents' identities being challenged; and feelings of shame, guilt, and blame after their stillbirth. Stigmatising experiences could be different based on the bereaved parent's cultural background. Further research which attempts to conceptualise stillbirth stigma and explores those experiences from a bereaved parent perspective is needed to help inform stigma reduction strategies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization, and the 2011 and 2016 Lancet Stillbirth series as well as medical and scientific literature, have all called for stillbirth stigma to be reduced. However, few studies have explored or attempted to conceptualise the meaning of stigma in the context of stillbirth.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To explore the current knowledge surrounding stillbirth stigma, specifically the extent, type and experiences of bereaved parents.
METHODS METHODS
A five-stage scoping review framework was utilised. A search of relevant databases (MedLine, EMBASE, PsychInfo, PsychArticles, and Ovid Emcare) was undertaken with several key words related to 'stillbirth' and 'stigma.' The reference lists of included studies were also searched.
FINDINGS RESULTS
A total of 23 resources met the inclusion criteria for this review. A thematic analysis regarding how stigma was conceptualised and/or experienced within results and/or discussion was employed on these studies. Five over-arching themes, with several sub-themes, were discovered: Type of stigma, identity, silence, bereaved mothers' experiences of stigma in low-income countries and transformation.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Stillbirth stigma remains an under-researched topic. Few articles conceptualised the experiences of the bereaved parent within a stigma framework. However, examples of bereaved parents enduring stigma were found within the literature. Common stigmatising experiences included, bereaved parents' identities being challenged; and feelings of shame, guilt, and blame after their stillbirth. Stigmatising experiences could be different based on the bereaved parent's cultural background.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Further research which attempts to conceptualise stillbirth stigma and explores those experiences from a bereaved parent perspective is needed to help inform stigma reduction strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31296472
pii: S1871-5192(18)31724-4
doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.05.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

207-218

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Danielle Pollock (D)

University of South Australia, School of Nursing and Midwifery, City East Campus, 108 North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Electronic address: Danielle.Pollock@unisa.edu.au.

Tahereh Ziaian (T)

University of South Australia, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, St Bernards Rd, Magill SA 5072, Australia.

Elissa Pearson (E)

University of South Australia, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, St Bernards Rd, Magill SA 5072, Australia.

Megan Cooper (M)

University of South Australia, School of Nursing and Midwifery, City East Campus, 108 North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.

Jane Warland (J)

University of South Australia, School of Nursing and Midwifery, City East Campus, 108 North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH