Does urodynamics predict voiding after benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery in patients with detrusor underactivity?
Benign prostatic enlargement
Detrusor underactivity
Follow-up
Photovaporization of the prostate
Urodynamic study
Journal
Asian journal of urology
ISSN: 2214-3882
Titre abrégé: Asian J Urol
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101699720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
06
06
2018
revised:
21
07
2018
accepted:
25
10
2018
entrez:
13
7
2019
pubmed:
13
7
2019
medline:
13
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to determine if urodynamic study (UDS) predicted voiding outcomes in men with detrusor underactivity (DU) and benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) who underwent photovaporization of the prostate (PVP). Between September 2010 and July 2015, 106 male patients with BPE and DU were identified. All patients underwent PVP. Urinary retention was noted by the preoperative necessity for an indwelling or intermittent catheter. Data collection included comorbidities, quality of life (QoL) scores, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), UDS and perioperative outcomes. UDS parameters included volume at first desire to void, volume at first urge to void, volume of severe urge, volume at capacity, compliance, detrusor contractions, maximum urinary flow rate (Q A total of 106 men were included in this analysis, who had urinary retention with a Foley catheter or clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) at the time of surgery. At baseline we found patients who voided had a detrusor pressure at Q The patients with DU and BPE might be able to successfully void after undergoing PVP regardless of UDS findings. All men who voided had improved international prostate symptom score and QoL scores compared to baseline and these parameters were durable up to 12 months.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31297318
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.12.005
pii: S2214-3882(18)30104-8
pmc: PMC6595193
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
264-269Références
Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(6):647-52
pubmed: 10529713
World J Urol. 1999 Oct;17(5):274-8
pubmed: 10552143
Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167-78
pubmed: 11857671
Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261-74
pubmed: 11948720
BJU Int. 2004 Apr;93(6):745-50
pubmed: 15049984
Urology. 2007 May;69(5):859-63
pubmed: 17482922
Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):419-26
pubmed: 18325657
BJU Int. 2010 May;105(10):1429-33
pubmed: 19863522
J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1793-803
pubmed: 21420124
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1987-97
pubmed: 22551104
Korean J Urol. 2012 May;53(5):342-8
pubmed: 22670194
World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):469-73
pubmed: 23884373
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109
pubmed: 25613154
Int Neurourol J. 2015 Dec;19(4):278-85
pubmed: 26739183
Urology. 2016 May;91:158-66
pubmed: 26879733
BJU Int. 2016 Oct;118(4):633-40
pubmed: 26970202
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):407-416
pubmed: 28598556
J Urol. 1998 Nov;160(5):1713-7
pubmed: 9783938