Minimally invasive open dismembered pyeloplasty technique: Miniature incision, muscle-splitting dissection, and nopelvis reduction in children.
Children
Miniature incision
Open dismembered pyeloplasty
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
Journal
Asian journal of urology
ISSN: 2214-3882
Titre abrégé: Asian J Urol
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101699720
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
05
03
2017
revised:
18
04
2017
accepted:
27
09
2017
entrez:
13
7
2019
pubmed:
13
7
2019
medline:
13
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To report the outcomes and complications of open dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty with miniature incision in treating children's ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Between March 2007 and April 2011, 109 children with a mean age of 2 years and 8 months old with ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent open dismembered pyeloplasty. Clinical manifestations, radiographic assessments, incision size, surgery time, hospital stay, and complication rate were recorded. All patients had a documented ureteropelvic junction obstruction (having T1/2 more than 20 min in diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [DTPA] scan) with symptomatic stenosis or decreased kidney function (differential function <40%). Pyeloplasty was done by a retroperitoneal flank approach with miniature incision without pelvis reduction. One surgeon did all the surgeries. Success rate and complications were assessed in a 3-year follow-up. Mean surgery time was 52 min (47-60 min). Incision size was 18-28 mm. Mean hospital stay was 3 days (2-8 days). The surgery was successful in 98.2% of patients with a mean follow-up time of 36 months (success was defined as disappearance of symptoms, if present, with improved ultrasound imaging results or Reno graphic parameters). The complication rate was 7.33%, including urinary leakage, double-J urethral stent dislocation and infection. Open dismembered pyeloplasty is a safe, technically feasible and effective therapy in treatment of children's ureteropelvic junction obstruction. It takes a short time to do, requires a small incision and has few complications and a short recovery period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31297321
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.001
pii: S2214-3882(18)30065-1
pmc: PMC6595094
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
290-293Références
J Endourol. 2003 Apr;17(3):155-60
pubmed: 12803987
Int J Urol. 2003 Nov;10(11):563-8
pubmed: 14633078
J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1710-3; discussion 1713
pubmed: 15821565
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 May 20;119(10):840-4
pubmed: 16732987
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1073-6
pubmed: 16890693
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Jul 20;120(14):1270-3
pubmed: 17697582
Br J Urol. 1949 Sep;21(3):209-14
pubmed: 18148283
J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Oct;5(5):368-73
pubmed: 19369118
J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):690-5
pubmed: 20639039
J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6 Suppl):2517-22
pubmed: 21555027
Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Mar-Apr;7(3-4):94-8
pubmed: 22277634
Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1336-41
pubmed: 23522294
J Xray Sci Technol. 2013;21(3):429-39
pubmed: 24004873
Urology. 2014 Jul;84(1):180-4
pubmed: 24713134
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):4922-31
pubmed: 26131065
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(2):245-51
pubmed: 26251754
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Dec;11(6):328-36
pubmed: 26553288
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Sep-Oct;41(5):927-34
pubmed: 26689518
J Urol. 1995 Jun;153(6):1962-5
pubmed: 7752371