Optimizing responses to drug safety signals in pregnancy: the example of dolutegravir and neural tube defects.
Adolescent
Anti-HIV Agents
/ adverse effects
Botswana
/ epidemiology
Female
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
HIV-1
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
/ adverse effects
Humans
Neural Tube Defects
/ chemically induced
Oxazines
Piperazines
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
/ chemically induced
Pyridones
Risk Assessment
ARV
health systems
neural tube defects
periconception
pharmacovigilance
treatment
women
Journal
Journal of the International AIDS Society
ISSN: 1758-2652
Titre abrégé: J Int AIDS Soc
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478566
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
29
04
2019
accepted:
25
06
2019
entrez:
13
7
2019
pubmed:
13
7
2019
medline:
28
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The unexpected identification of a neural tube defect (NTD) safety signal with preconception dolutegravir (DTG) exposure in the Botswana Tsepamo birth outcomes study brought into sharp focus the need for reliable data on use of new antiretrovirals in pregnancy, improved pharmacovigilance systems to evaluate safety of new drugs being introduced into populations including women of reproductive potential, and balanced risk-benefit messaging when a safety signal is identified. The Tsepamo study NTD safety signal and accompanying regulatory responses led to uncertainty about the most appropriate approach to DTG use among women of reproductive potential, affecting global DTG roll-out plans, and limiting DTG use in adolescent girls and women. It also revealed a tension between a public health approach to antiretroviral treatment (ART) and individual choice, and highlighted difficulties interpreting and messaging an unexpected safety signal with uncertainty about risk. This difficulty was compounded by the lack of high-quality data on pregnancy outcomes from women receiving ART outside the Tsepamo surveillance sites and countries other than Botswana, resulting in a prolonged period of uncertainty while data on additional exposures are evaluated to refute or confirm the initial safety signal. We discuss principles for evaluating and introducing new drugs in the general population that would ensure collection of appropriate data to inform drug safety in adolescent girls and women of reproductive potential and minimize confusion about drug use in this population when a safety signal is identified. The response to a signal suggesting a possible safety risk for a drug used in pregnancy or among women who may become pregnant needs to be rapid and comprehensive. It requires the existence of appropriately designed surveillance systems with broad population coverage; data analyses that examine risk-benefit trade-offs in a variety of contexts; guidance to transform this risk-benefit balance into effective and agreed-upon policy; involvement of the affected community and other key stakeholders; and a communication plan for all levels of knowledge and complexity. Implementation of this proposed framework for responding to safety signals is needed to ensure that any drug used in pregnancy can be rapidly and appropriately evaluated should a serious safety alert arise.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31298496
doi: 10.1002/jia2.25352
pmc: PMC6625340
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
0
Oxazines
0
Piperazines
0
Pyridones
0
dolutegravir
DKO1W9H7M1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e25352Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L006758/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society.
Références
Lancet. 2018 Jul 21;392(10143):199
pubmed: 30043745
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 6;379(10):979-981
pubmed: 30037297
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(7):1254-1258
pubmed: 30783649
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2011 Oct;92(5):395-403
pubmed: 21770028
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172222
pubmed: 28783807
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Mar;9(2):118-29
pubmed: 27006699
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e804-e810
pubmed: 29880310
Reprod Health. 2017 Dec 14;14(Suppl 3):158
pubmed: 29297364
BMJ. 2012 Jun 18;344:e3996
pubmed: 22709962
JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2077-2078
pubmed: 30422300
AIDS. 2014 Mar;28 Suppl 2:S123-31
pubmed: 24849471
AIDS. 2018 Jul 31;32(12):1551-1561
pubmed: 29746295
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Jul;22(7):e25352
pubmed: 31298496
Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):78
pubmed: 29378652
Drug Saf. 2017 Jan;40(1):15-36
pubmed: 27743334
Lancet HIV. 2019 Feb;6(2):e116-e127
pubmed: 30503325
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007 Aug;4(3):135-40
pubmed: 17883999
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Jan;88(1):64-9
pubmed: 19637252
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):614-625
pubmed: 30934067
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0151586
pubmed: 27064786
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;84(2):215-222
pubmed: 28925019