Differences in early auditory exposure across neonatal environments.


Journal

Early human development
ISSN: 1872-6232
Titre abrégé: Early Hum Dev
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7708381

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 27 03 2019
revised: 21 05 2019
accepted: 01 07 2019
pubmed: 13 7 2019
medline: 6 2 2020
entrez: 13 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To date, no study has compared preterm and full term auditory environments. To define differences in auditory exposure for preterm infants at term equivalent age in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) compared to auditory exposure in hospital rooms on a labor and delivery ward after full term birth. Ninety-eight infants (48 preterm infants born 28 weeks gestation in the NICU at term equivalent age and 50 full term infants in a hospital room on the labor and delivery ward within 4 days of birth) had auditory exposure measured over a single 16-hour period using the Language Environment Acquisition (LENA) device. More language (p < 0.001) was observed on the labor and delivery ward than in the NICU, with an average of 3.3 h more language in a 16-hour period and an average of 14,110 more words spoken around infants in a 16-hour period on the labor and delivery ward (p < 0.001). More electronic sounds were observed in the NICU, with an average of 2.3 h more in the 16-hour period (p < 0.001). The average decibel level in the NICU was lower than in the hospital rooms on the labor and delivery ward (57.16 ± 2.30 dB, compared to 63.31 ± 2.22 dB; p < 0.001). The NICU auditory environment for preterm infants is different than the auditory environment for full term infants, with less language, more electronic sounds, and quieter stimuli. This understanding can aid in developing appropriate interventions that enhance positive forms of auditory exposures.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To date, no study has compared preterm and full term auditory environments.
AIM
To define differences in auditory exposure for preterm infants at term equivalent age in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) compared to auditory exposure in hospital rooms on a labor and delivery ward after full term birth.
STUDY DESIGN
Ninety-eight infants (48 preterm infants born 28 weeks gestation in the NICU at term equivalent age and 50 full term infants in a hospital room on the labor and delivery ward within 4 days of birth) had auditory exposure measured over a single 16-hour period using the Language Environment Acquisition (LENA) device.
RESULTS
More language (p < 0.001) was observed on the labor and delivery ward than in the NICU, with an average of 3.3 h more language in a 16-hour period and an average of 14,110 more words spoken around infants in a 16-hour period on the labor and delivery ward (p < 0.001). More electronic sounds were observed in the NICU, with an average of 2.3 h more in the 16-hour period (p < 0.001). The average decibel level in the NICU was lower than in the hospital rooms on the labor and delivery ward (57.16 ± 2.30 dB, compared to 63.31 ± 2.22 dB; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The NICU auditory environment for preterm infants is different than the auditory environment for full term infants, with less language, more electronic sounds, and quieter stimuli. This understanding can aid in developing appropriate interventions that enhance positive forms of auditory exposures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31299550
pii: S0378-3782(19)30197-5
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.07.001
pmc: PMC6689434
mid: NIHMS1534156
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

27-32

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P30 HD062171
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U54 HD087011
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD055931
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000448
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R24 HD065688
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002345
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Références

J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 2):S55-60
pubmed: 11190701
J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 2):S12-20
pubmed: 11190691
J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 2):S31-6
pubmed: 11190698
J Pediatr. 2011 May;158(5):766-774.e1
pubmed: 21146182
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Apr 1;27(4):2500-2512
pubmed: 27102655
Acta Paediatr. 2017 Dec;106(12):1909-1914
pubmed: 28477430
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Mar;41(2):166-170
pubmed: 22834845
J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 2):S21-30
pubmed: 11190697
Adv Neonatal Care. 2008 Oct;8(5 Suppl):S16-26
pubmed: 18818538
Neonatal Netw. 2005 Nov-Dec;24(6):33-7
pubmed: 16383183
Science. 1971 Jan 22;171(3968):303-6
pubmed: 5538846
Neuroreport. 2017 Jul 5;28(10):561-564
pubmed: 28538518
Acta Paediatr. 2013 May;102(5):451-61
pubmed: 23397889
Acta Otolaryngol. 1992;112(2):192-6
pubmed: 1604977
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):587-97
pubmed: 22926177
J Pediatr. 2014 Jan;164(1):52-60.e2
pubmed: 24139564
Semin Perinatol. 1997 Jun;21(3):202-20
pubmed: 9205976
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Aug;21(8):1705-11
pubmed: 21149849
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2001;12(2 Suppl):91-9
pubmed: 11605684
J Pediatr. 2017 Apr;183:56-66.e3
pubmed: 28189301
Front Neurosci. 2014 Dec 05;8:381
pubmed: 25538543
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;32(3):402-9
pubmed: 12774883
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):540-6
pubmed: 19171620
Pediatrics. 1997 Oct;100(4):724-7
pubmed: 9836852
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 Jul;96(4):F305-9
pubmed: 20547580
Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):910-6
pubmed: 22007020
Ann Neurol. 2011 Oct;70(4):541-9
pubmed: 21976396
Int J Audiol. 2007 Sep;46(9):460-78
pubmed: 17828663
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Mar;26(4):392-5
pubmed: 23190305
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;19(2):78-83
pubmed: 24275068
J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):368-73
pubmed: 21852773
Early Hum Dev. 1994 Jan;36(1):13-26
pubmed: 8026361
Br J Disord Commun. 1983 Dec;18(3):187-96
pubmed: 6661390
Early Hum Dev. 2018 Feb;117:32-38
pubmed: 29275070
HERD. 2017 Apr;10(3):30-39
pubmed: 27682021
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Apr;32(4):417-32
pubmed: 20397297

Auteurs

Lara Liszka (L)

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.

Joan Smith (J)

Division of Quality, Safety and Practice Excellence, Saint Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.

Amit Mathur (A)

Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.

Bradley L Schlaggar (BL)

Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States of America.

Graham Colditz (G)

Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.

Roberta Pineda (R)

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, United States of America. Electronic address: pineda_r@kids.wustl.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH