The role of health animators in malaria control: a qualitative study of the health animator (HA) approach within the Majete malaria project (MMP) in Chikwawa District, Malawi.
Adolescent
Adult
Community Health Workers
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Focus Groups
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Services Research
Humans
Malaria
/ prevention & control
Malawi
Male
Middle Aged
Professional Role
Qualitative Research
Volunteers
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Community health workers
Malaria volunteers
Malaria workshop meetings
Malawi
Social capital theory
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jul 2019
12 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
25
01
2019
accepted:
02
07
2019
entrez:
14
7
2019
pubmed:
14
7
2019
medline:
15
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Malaria continues to place a high burden on communities due to challenges reaching intervention target levels in Chikwawa District, Malawi. The Hunger Project Malawi is using a health animator approach (HA) to address gaps in malaria control coverage. We explored the influence of community-based volunteers known as health animators (HAs) in malaria control. We assessed the impact of HAs on knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards malaria interventions. This paper draws on the qualitative data collected to explore the roles of communities, HAs and formal health workers attending and not attending malaria workshops for malaria control. Purposive sampling was used to select 78 respondents. We conducted 10 separate focus group discussions (FGDs)-(n = 6) with community members and (n = 4) key informants. Nine in-depth interviews (IDIs) were held with HAs and Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) in three focal areas near Majete Wildlife Reserve. Nvivo 11 was used for coding and analysis. We employed the framework analysis and social capital theory to determine how the intervention influenced health and social outcomes. Using education, feedback sessions and advocacy in malaria workshop had mixed outcomes. There was a high awareness of community participation and comprehensive knowledge of the HA approach as key to malaria control. HAs were identified as playing a complementary role in malaria intervention. Community members' attitudes towards advocacy for better health services were poor. Attendance in malaria workshops was sporadic towards the final year of the intervention. Respondents mentioned positive attitudes and practices on net usage for prevention and prompt health-seeking behaviours. The HA approach is a useful strategy for complementing malaria prevention strategies in rural communities and improving practices for health-seeking behaviour. Various factors influence HAs' motivation, retention, community engagement, and programme sustainability. However, little is known about how these factors interact to influence volunteers' motivation, community participation and sustainability over time. More research is needed to explore the acceptability of an HA approach and the impact on malaria control in other rural communities in Malawi.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Malaria continues to place a high burden on communities due to challenges reaching intervention target levels in Chikwawa District, Malawi. The Hunger Project Malawi is using a health animator approach (HA) to address gaps in malaria control coverage. We explored the influence of community-based volunteers known as health animators (HAs) in malaria control. We assessed the impact of HAs on knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards malaria interventions.
METHODS
METHODS
This paper draws on the qualitative data collected to explore the roles of communities, HAs and formal health workers attending and not attending malaria workshops for malaria control. Purposive sampling was used to select 78 respondents. We conducted 10 separate focus group discussions (FGDs)-(n = 6) with community members and (n = 4) key informants. Nine in-depth interviews (IDIs) were held with HAs and Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) in three focal areas near Majete Wildlife Reserve. Nvivo 11 was used for coding and analysis. We employed the framework analysis and social capital theory to determine how the intervention influenced health and social outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Using education, feedback sessions and advocacy in malaria workshop had mixed outcomes. There was a high awareness of community participation and comprehensive knowledge of the HA approach as key to malaria control. HAs were identified as playing a complementary role in malaria intervention. Community members' attitudes towards advocacy for better health services were poor. Attendance in malaria workshops was sporadic towards the final year of the intervention. Respondents mentioned positive attitudes and practices on net usage for prevention and prompt health-seeking behaviours.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The HA approach is a useful strategy for complementing malaria prevention strategies in rural communities and improving practices for health-seeking behaviour. Various factors influence HAs' motivation, retention, community engagement, and programme sustainability. However, little is known about how these factors interact to influence volunteers' motivation, community participation and sustainability over time. More research is needed to explore the acceptability of an HA approach and the impact on malaria control in other rural communities in Malawi.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31299974
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4320-x
pii: 10.1186/s12913-019-4320-x
pmc: PMC6624973
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
478Subventions
Organisme : Dioraphte Foundation, the Netherlands.
ID : 000000
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):186
pubmed: 29554964
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(5):1174-84
pubmed: 18155335
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Jan 26;11:3
pubmed: 22280458
Malar J. 2018 Jul 16;17(1):266
pubmed: 30012147
Nature. 2017 Oct 26;550(7677):515-518
pubmed: 29019978
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 15;16(Suppl 7):623
pubmed: 28185589
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004015
pubmed: 15674924
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):111-119
pubmed: 23136286
Glob Public Health. 2017 Nov;12(11):1404-1432
pubmed: 27133127
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;33(4):650-67
pubmed: 15282219
Malar Res Treat. 2010;2010:794261
pubmed: 22332023
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1992;23 Suppl 1:30-5
pubmed: 1341841
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Dec;29(8):1075-85
pubmed: 24277736
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14 Suppl 1:S4
pubmed: 25079588
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Malar J. 2017 Jan 3;16(1):10
pubmed: 28049486
Trials. 2014 Feb 25;15:65
pubmed: 24565019
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):54-60
pubmed: 23136278
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):495
pubmed: 28720090
Malar J. 2016 Aug 15;15(1):413
pubmed: 27527707
Lancet. 2007 Jun 23;369(9579):2121-31
pubmed: 17586307
Global Health. 2017 Nov 20;13(1):84
pubmed: 29157284
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Oct;82(10):724-31; discussion 732
pubmed: 15643791
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:27-34
pubmed: 27459022
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 20;12:328
pubmed: 22995125
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Jan 11;15(1):4
pubmed: 28077148
Global Health. 2014 Dec 11;10:85
pubmed: 25499098
Malar J. 2016 Mar 21;15:177
pubmed: 27000034
Glob Health Action. 2011 Feb 08;4:5611
pubmed: 21311607
Malar J. 2009 Feb 19;8:29
pubmed: 19228387
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Sep 22;17(1):639
pubmed: 28938876
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1392-402
pubmed: 18000078
Malar J. 2017 Oct 18;16(1):419
pubmed: 29047388
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
J Parasitol Res. 2012;2012:748540
pubmed: 22970347
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0172266
pubmed: 28196105
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD004015
pubmed: 20238326
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Nov;87(5 Suppl):61-68
pubmed: 23136279
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Jun;66(3):272-306
pubmed: 19174538
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0141091
pubmed: 26496124
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Apr 2;2(2):112-118
pubmed: 31514640
Malawi Med J. 2013 Mar;25(1):5-11
pubmed: 23717748