Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS.


Journal

Radiography (London, England : 1995)
ISSN: 1532-2831
Titre abrégé: Radiography (Lond)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9604102

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 26 11 2018
revised: 21 01 2019
accepted: 04 02 2019
entrez: 15 7 2019
pubmed: 16 7 2019
medline: 1 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Scoliosis is defined as a deformity of the spine with lateral curvature in the coronal plane. It requires regular X-ray imaging to monitor the progress of the disorder, therefore scoliotic patients are frequently exposed to radiation. It is important to lower the risk from these exposures for young patients. The aim of this work is to compare organ dose (OD) values resulting from Scan Projection Radiograph (SPR) mode in CT against projection radiography and EOS A dosimetry phantom was used to represent a 10-year old child. Thermoluminescent dosimetry detectors were used for measuring OD. The phantom was imaged with CT in SPR mode using 27 imaging parameters; projection radiography and EOS machines using local scoliosis imaging procedures. Imaging was performed in anteroposterior, posteroanterior and lateral positions. 17 protocols delivered significantly lower radiation dose than projection radiography (p < 0.05). OD values from the CT SPR imaging protocols and projection radiography were statistically significant higher than the results from EOS. No statistically significant differences in OD were observed between 10 imaging protocols and those from projection radiography and EOS imaging protocols (p > 0.05). EOS has the lowest dose. Where this technology is not available we suggest there is a potential for OD reduction in scoliosis imaging using CT SPR compared to projection radiography. Further work is required to investigate image quality in relation to the measurement of Cobb angle with CT SPR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31301794
pii: S1078-8174(19)30012-4
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e68-e74

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

F Alrehily (F)

College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, 42353, Saudi Arabia; School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: f.alrehily@edu.salford.ac.uk.

P Hogg (P)

School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom.

M Twiste (M)

School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom.

S Johansen (S)

Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Norway; Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.

A Tootell (A)

School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH