Electrodeposition of indium from the ionic liquid trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride.
Journal
Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC
ISSN: 1463-9262
Titre abrégé: Green Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101307052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Mar 2019
21 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
29
10
2018
accepted:
23
01
2019
entrez:
16
7
2019
pubmed:
16
7
2019
medline:
16
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The electrochemical behavior of indium in the ionic liquid trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium chloride (Cyphos IL 101) was studied. Cyphos IL 101 first had to be purified, as the impurities present in commercial Cyphos IL 101 interfered with the electrochemical measurements. Electrochemical deposition of indium metal from this electrolyte occurs without hydrogen evolution, increasing the cathodic current efficiency compared to deposition from water and avoiding porosity within the deposited metal. Indium(iii) is the most stable oxidation state in the ionic liquid. This ion is reduced in two steps, first from indium(iii) to indium(i) and subsequently to indium(0). The high thermal stability of Cyphos IL 101 allowed the electrodeposition of indium at 120 °C and 180 °C. At 180 °C indium was deposited as liquid indium which allows for the easy separation of the indium and the possibility to design a continuous electrowinning process. On molybdenum, indium deposits as liquid droplets even below the melting point of indium. This was explained by the combination of melting point depression and undercooling. The possibility to separate indium from iron and zinc by electrodeposition was tested. It is possible to separate indium from zinc by electrodeposition, but iron deposits together with indium.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31303860
doi: 10.1039/c8gc03389g
pii: c8gc03389g
pmc: PMC6592163
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1517-1530Références
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018 Jan 24;20(4):2444-2456
pubmed: 29313045
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Aug 29;15(9):15320-43
pubmed: 25177864
J Phys Chem A. 2014 Aug 21;118(33):6685-91
pubmed: 24956031
Dalton Trans. 2012 Feb 14;41(6):1742-54
pubmed: 22159182
Chem Rev. 2014 Nov 12;114(21):11060-82
pubmed: 25300631
ChemSusChem. 2012 Jan 9;5(1):117-24
pubmed: 22086860
J Electrochem Soc. 2016;163(14):
pubmed: 32831360
Dalton Trans. 2010 Dec 21;39(47):11375-82
pubmed: 20981382
Dalton Trans. 2017 Mar 27;46(13):4412-4421
pubmed: 28294262
Dalton Trans. 2016 May 10;45(19):8089-98
pubmed: 27080261
Dalton Trans. 2010 Oct 7;39(37):8679-87
pubmed: 20714633
Inorg Chem. 2011 Jun 6;50(11):5258-71
pubmed: 21545101
Chemphyschem. 2004 Aug 20;5(8):1106-20
pubmed: 15446732
Chem Commun (Camb). 2018 Jan 11;54(5):475-478
pubmed: 29260154