Shear bond strength of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to enamel using color-change adhesive.
Adhesive
dental enamel
orthodontic brackets
shear strength
Journal
Dental research journal
ISSN: 1735-3327
Titre abrégé: Dent Res J (Isfahan)
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101471186
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
16
7
2019
pubmed:
16
7
2019
medline:
16
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to the enamel using Grengloo color-change adhesive and Transbond XT conventional composite. In this The effect of type of bracket (metal/ceramic) on SBS was not statistically significant ( Regarding the high SBS and the safe region of bond failure in Grengloo composite, this color-change adhesive can be a suitable alternative in cases that require high bond strength. Furthermore, the color contrast of Grengloo can make composite removal easier than Transbond XT with color match of composite and teeth.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to the enamel using Grengloo color-change adhesive and Transbond XT conventional composite.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
In this
RESULTS
RESULTS
The effect of type of bracket (metal/ceramic) on SBS was not statistically significant (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Regarding the high SBS and the safe region of bond failure in Grengloo composite, this color-change adhesive can be a suitable alternative in cases that require high bond strength. Furthermore, the color contrast of Grengloo can make composite removal easier than Transbond XT with color match of composite and teeth.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
233-238Références
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jun;119(6):621-4
pubmed: 11395706
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Sep;102(3):215-9
pubmed: 1510045
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Apr;26(2):179-84
pubmed: 15130041
East Mediterr Health J. 2003 Jan-Mar;9(1-2):201-7
pubmed: 15562752
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):295-300
pubmed: 16539557
Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):1101-8
pubmed: 18004914
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):87-93
pubmed: 19797413
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Oct;32(5):571-4
pubmed: 20089571
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):615-622.e3
pubmed: 20451780
Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1036-44
pubmed: 20677952
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):387.e1-387.e9
pubmed: 20889035
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):348-53
pubmed: 2145756
Tex Dent J. 2011 Mar;128(3):267-75
pubmed: 21667823
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Feb;35(1):103-9
pubmed: 21926314
J Orofac Orthop. 2012 Jan;73(1):49-57
pubmed: 22246049
Angle Orthod. 1990 Winter;60(4):269-76
pubmed: 2256564
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Nov;28(6):1461-6
pubmed: 23135786
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):705-11
pubmed: 23270384
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2011 Jun 29;3:39-44
pubmed: 23674913
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):76-80
pubmed: 23916435
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 May-Jun;12(3):265-70
pubmed: 26005468
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2015;58(2):43-8
pubmed: 26455565
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):43-50
pubmed: 28125139
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Nov;94(5):367-71
pubmed: 3055937
Am J Orthod. 1977 Jun;71(6):637-50
pubmed: 326059
Am J Orthod. 1980 Mar;77(3):269-83
pubmed: 6987877
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Mar;103(3):258-66
pubmed: 8456784
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 May;111(5):498-501
pubmed: 9155808
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jul;112(1):34-40
pubmed: 9228839