Effect of bleaching protocols on surface roughness and biofilm formation on silorane-based composite resin.
Biofilm
composite resin
silorane
tooth bleaching
Journal
Dental research journal
ISSN: 1735-3327
Titre abrégé: Dent Res J (Isfahan)
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101471186
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
16
7
2019
pubmed:
16
7
2019
medline:
16
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Knowledge about the effect of bleaching on behavior of composite resins is important to find a suitable composite resin for restoration of teeth undergoing bleaching. This study aimed to assess the effect of different bleaching protocols on surface roughness and biofilm formation on a silorane-based composite resin. In this The mean surface roughness of the four groups was not significantly different ( Bleaching decreased biofilm formation. The lowest biofilm formation was noted in the group subjected to light-activated 35% hydrogen peroxide. Increased surface roughness enhanced biofilm formation to a certain level; excessive roughness did not increase biofilm formation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Knowledge about the effect of bleaching on behavior of composite resins is important to find a suitable composite resin for restoration of teeth undergoing bleaching. This study aimed to assess the effect of different bleaching protocols on surface roughness and biofilm formation on a silorane-based composite resin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
In this
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean surface roughness of the four groups was not significantly different (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Bleaching decreased biofilm formation. The lowest biofilm formation was noted in the group subjected to light-activated 35% hydrogen peroxide. Increased surface roughness enhanced biofilm formation to a certain level; excessive roughness did not increase biofilm formation.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
264-270Références
Biomaterials. 2001 Mar;22(5):481-7
pubmed: 11214759
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2003 Mar;11(1):9-13
pubmed: 12705033
Int Endod J. 2003 May;36(5):313-29
pubmed: 12752645
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):466-73
pubmed: 12806324
J Dent. 2003 Nov;31(8):543-8
pubmed: 14554071
J Dent. 2004;32 Suppl 1:35-9
pubmed: 14738833
Oper Dent. 2004 Jul-Aug;29(4):398-403
pubmed: 15279478
Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):852-61
pubmed: 15451241
Oper Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):473-80
pubmed: 16924988
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008 Jul;86(1):36-44
pubmed: 18098186
Dent Mater J. 2007 Sep;26(5):613-22
pubmed: 18203458
Dent Mater J. 2007 Nov;26(6):915-23
pubmed: 18203499
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Feb;88(2):454-63
pubmed: 18306290
Dent Mater. 2009 Feb;25(2):269-75
pubmed: 18768217
Dent Mater. 2009 Feb;25(2):254-60
pubmed: 18774601
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 Jul 01;16(4):e561-7
pubmed: 20711117
Eur J Dent. 2011 Apr;5(2):143-9
pubmed: 21494380
Eur J Dent. 2011 Apr;5(2):173-9
pubmed: 21494385
Dent Mater. 2011 Aug;27(8):770-8
pubmed: 21524789
J Can Dent Assoc. 2011;77:b59
pubmed: 21627869
Dent Mater. 2011 Dec;27(12):1238-45
pubmed: 22005004
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Nov 01;17(6):e1082-8
pubmed: 22926466
J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):356-61
pubmed: 23956541
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):13-9
pubmed: 24155597
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014 Feb 18;46(1):30-4
pubmed: 24535343
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jan;11(1):56-66
pubmed: 24910677
Am J Dent. 2015 Feb;28(1):57-60
pubmed: 25864244
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2015 Jun;24(3):283-7
pubmed: 26166513
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016 Fall;10(4):213-219
pubmed: 28096946
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Feb 1;9(2):e249-e253
pubmed: 28210444
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):169-78
pubmed: 8666447