Molecular Modeling of Structure and Dynamics of Nafion Protonation States.
Journal
The journal of physical chemistry. B
ISSN: 1520-5207
Titre abrégé: J Phys Chem B
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101157530
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 08 2019
08 08 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
16
7
2019
medline:
16
7
2019
entrez:
16
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present the results of the atomistic molecular dynamics modeling of different protonation states of Nafion at varying hydration levels. Previous experiments have shown that the degree of deprotonation (DDP) of the sulfonic acid groups in a Nafion membrane varies significantly upon hydration. Our goal is to provide insights into the effects of variable protonation states and water content on the internal structure and vehicular transport inside the Nafion membrane. The Nafion side chain lengths showed a weak increasing trend with increasing DDP at all hydration levels, exposing more of the sulfonic acid groups to the hydrophilic/water phase. The water-phase characteristic size/diameter decreased with increasing DDP, but, interestingly, the average number of water molecules per cluster increased. The probability of water-hydronium hydrogen bond formation decreased with increasing DDP, despite an increase in the total number of such hydrogen bonds. The water diffusion was largely unaffected by the state of deprotonation. In contrast to that, the hydronium ion diffusion slowed down with increasing DDP in the overall membrane. The hydronium ion residence times around the sulfonic acid group increased with increasing DDP. Our simulations show a strong connection between the morphology of the water domains and protonation states of Nafion. Such a connection can also be expected in polyelectrolyte membranes similar to Nafion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31306017
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04534
pmc: PMC6691399
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6882-6891Références
Science. 2004 Jan 30;303(5658):658-60
pubmed: 14752157
J Phys Chem A. 2005 Aug 25;109(33):7583-93
pubmed: 16834128
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Mar 10;109(9):4269-78
pubmed: 16851491
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Mar 8;111(9):2208-18
pubmed: 17288476
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Jun 28;111(25):7234-44
pubmed: 17518488
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Jul 19;111(28):8069-79
pubmed: 17580862
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2007 Jun 7;9(21):2602-18
pubmed: 17627306
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Nov 15;111(45):13006-13
pubmed: 17949078
Nat Mater. 2008 Jan;7(1):75-83
pubmed: 18066069
J Phys Chem B. 2009 Jul 30;113(30):10210-21
pubmed: 19572659
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009 Nov 21;11(43):10017-28
pubmed: 19865754
J Phys Chem B. 2010 May 13;114(18):6056-64
pubmed: 20402464
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Nov 4;114(43):13681-90
pubmed: 20860379
Langmuir. 2012 Jan 10;28(1):235-41
pubmed: 22039913
J Chem Phys. 2012 Apr 28;136(16):164313
pubmed: 22559488
Acc Chem Res. 2012 Nov 20;45(11):2002-10
pubmed: 22594551
ACS Nano. 2013 Aug 27;7(8):6767-73
pubmed: 23829411
J Phys Chem B. 2013 Dec 27;117(51):16522-9
pubmed: 24320080
J Phys Chem B. 2017 May 11;121(18):4873-4884
pubmed: 28430444
J Phys Chem B. 2018 Jun 7;122(22):6107-6119
pubmed: 29757641
J Phys Chem B. 2018 Jun 28;122(25):6656-6665
pubmed: 29869882
J Mol Biol. 1993 Jun 20;231(4):1040-8
pubmed: 7685828
J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8
pubmed: 8744570