Feasibility and outcomes of a multi-function mobile health approach for the schizophrenia spectrum: App4Independence (A4i).
Adolescent
Adult
Canada
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Medication Adherence
Mental Health Services
/ organization & administration
Middle Aged
Mobile Applications
Patient Satisfaction
Psychotic Disorders
Research Design
Schizophrenia
/ therapy
Self-Management
Telemedicine
/ methods
Text Messaging
Urban Health Services
/ organization & administration
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
30
08
2018
accepted:
15
06
2019
entrez:
16
7
2019
pubmed:
16
7
2019
medline:
10
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Relative to the large investments in mobile health (mHealth) strategies for mental illnesses such as anxiety and depression, the development of technology to facilitate illness self-management for people with schizophrenia spectrum illnesses is limited. This situation falls out of step with the opportunity mHealth represents for providing inexpensive and accessible self-care resources and the routine use of mobile technologies by people with schizophrenia. Accordingly, the focus of this study was upon the feasibility of a schizophrenia-focused mobile application: App4Independence (A4i). A4i is a multi-feature app that uses feed, scheduling, and text-based functions co-designed with service users to enhance illness self-management. This study was completed in a large urban Canadian centre and employed pre-post assessments over a 1-month period that examined medication adherence, personal recovery, and psychiatric symptomatology. App use metrics were assessed as was qualitative feedback through semi-structured interview. Findings are reported in line with the World Health Organization mHealth Evidence and Assessment (mERA) checklist. Among the 38 individuals with a primary psychosis who participated, there was no research attrition and classic retention on the app was 52.5%. Significant improvement was observed in some psychiatric symptom domains with small-medium effects. Significant change in recovery engagement and medication adherence were not observed after controlling for multiple comparisons. Those who interacted with the app more frequently were more depressed and had higher hostility and interpersonal sensitivity at baseline. Satisfaction with the app was high and qualitative feedback provided insights regarding feature enhancements. This research suggested that A4i is feasible in terms of outcome and process indicators and is a technology that is ready to move on to clinical trial and validation testing. This study contributes to the small but emergent body of work investigating digital health approaches in severe mental illness populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31306439
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219491
pii: PONE-D-18-20735
pmc: PMC6629069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0219491Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AA and LK are paid employees of MEMOTEXT. AA is also a principal of MEMOTEXT. SK and AA have interests in the company App4Independence (A4i), a digital health engagement platform to support people living with schizophrenia, which will house the aforementioned app. MEMOTEXT holds 50% equity interest in A4i Inc. SK is a paid employee of CAMH. CAMH holds a 35% equity interest in A4i Inc. The authors would like to declare the following patents/patent applications associated with this research: US 16/109,394, CDN 3,015,178, and AUS 2018220089; filed for “Tool For Identifying Occurrence of Acute Incident Symptomatic of Mental Condition or Disorder” filed August 22/23; 2018. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Aug 20;44(5):1010-1020
pubmed: 29939367
Behav Modif. 2015 Nov;39(6):785-804
pubmed: 26187164
Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):60-9
pubmed: 18255269
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Feb 28;225(3):458-63
pubmed: 25563669
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;53(4):340-56
pubmed: 17703650
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):448-55
pubmed: 26400871
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Sep;17(9):591-602
pubmed: 25007383
J Psychiatr Pract. 2012 Jul;18(4):269-80
pubmed: 22805901
Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605
pubmed: 6622612
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;59(1):13-7
pubmed: 24444319
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;62(12):854-863
pubmed: 29194005
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Mar;41(1):39-45
pubmed: 27295133
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Oct 17;12:172
pubmed: 23075387
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;11(1):72-76
pubmed: 26011657
Schizophr Res. 2012 Aug;139(1-3):116-28
pubmed: 22658527
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 12;19(7):e245
pubmed: 28701292
JMIR Ment Health. 2015 May 20;2(2):e18
pubmed: 26543922
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 May;59(5):243-9
pubmed: 25007277
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1244-53
pubmed: 24609454
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017 May/Jun;25(3):146-154
pubmed: 28234658
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Dec;21(12):2017-28
pubmed: 16368053
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Aug 29;5(3):e56
pubmed: 30158102
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jan;96:239-246
pubmed: 29126059
BMJ. 2016 Mar 17;352:i1174
pubmed: 26988021
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Feb 27;5(1):e15
pubmed: 29487044
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;2(10):942-8
pubmed: 26462228