Women with infertility complying with and resisting polygyny: an explorative qualitative study in urban Gambia.
Childlessness
Coping
Harmful cultural practice
Infertility
Polygamy
Polygyny
Resistance
The Gambia
Women's rights
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2019
15 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
15
02
2019
accepted:
26
06
2019
entrez:
17
7
2019
pubmed:
17
7
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In many low-and middle-income countries women with infertility are often in polygynous marriages. From a human and women's rights perspective, the practice of polygyny is commonly understood as harmful. Studies indicate that polygyny aggravates negative life circumstances of women with infertility with respect to their health and social well-being. The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore how women with infertility experience polygyny and to understand their decision-making regarding these marriages. An explorative qualitative study was conducted among women with infertility in the urban communities of the West Coast region of The Gambia using in-depth interviews (30). Data analysis involved an emergent and partially inductive thematic framework and was carried out using NVivo 11. With the exception of some women with infertility who described positive experiences within polygynous marriages, most women emphasised conflicts that exist within polygynous households and reported financial and emotional difficulties. Thematic analysis identified several strategies of women with infertility to cope with and resist polygynous marriages, including overcoming childlessness, addressing conflict, spending time outside the compound, looking for social support, kanyaleng kafoolu, living separately and initiating divorce. Moreover, the experiences and decision-making power of women with infertility when it comes to polygynous marriages was found to be closely related to their socio-demographic background. This work highlights how women with infertility in polygynous marriages are in a precarious situation in urban Gambia. Women utilize a mix of compliance, coping and resistance strategies to navigate the challenges of polygynous marriages in a structurally constraining context.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In many low-and middle-income countries women with infertility are often in polygynous marriages. From a human and women's rights perspective, the practice of polygyny is commonly understood as harmful. Studies indicate that polygyny aggravates negative life circumstances of women with infertility with respect to their health and social well-being. The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore how women with infertility experience polygyny and to understand their decision-making regarding these marriages.
METHODS
METHODS
An explorative qualitative study was conducted among women with infertility in the urban communities of the West Coast region of The Gambia using in-depth interviews (30). Data analysis involved an emergent and partially inductive thematic framework and was carried out using NVivo 11.
RESULTS
RESULTS
With the exception of some women with infertility who described positive experiences within polygynous marriages, most women emphasised conflicts that exist within polygynous households and reported financial and emotional difficulties. Thematic analysis identified several strategies of women with infertility to cope with and resist polygynous marriages, including overcoming childlessness, addressing conflict, spending time outside the compound, looking for social support, kanyaleng kafoolu, living separately and initiating divorce. Moreover, the experiences and decision-making power of women with infertility when it comes to polygynous marriages was found to be closely related to their socio-demographic background.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This work highlights how women with infertility in polygynous marriages are in a precarious situation in urban Gambia. Women utilize a mix of compliance, coping and resistance strategies to navigate the challenges of polygynous marriages in a structurally constraining context.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31307488
doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0762-1
pii: 10.1186/s12978-019-0762-1
pmc: PMC6633655
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103Subventions
Organisme : Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
ID : /
Organisme : Global Minds Fund Operational Grant
ID : /
Organisme : Universitaire Stichting
ID : /
Références
Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):960-7
pubmed: 15016772
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;52(1):5-17
pubmed: 16463591
Cult Health Sex. 2008 Feb;10(2):159-73
pubmed: 18247209
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Oct;67(7):1083-93
pubmed: 18599172
Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):605-21
pubmed: 18820005
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jan;68(1):21-9
pubmed: 18952335
Health (London). 2009 Mar;13(2):197-217
pubmed: 19228828
Int Nurs Rev. 2010 Mar;57(1):121-7
pubmed: 20487484
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Nov;71(10):1773-9
pubmed: 20627499
Afr J Reprod Health. 2009 Sep;13(3):85-98
pubmed: 20690264
Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):623-9
pubmed: 21216790
Hum Reprod. 2012 May;27(5):1383-90
pubmed: 22357772
J Biosoc Sci. 2013 Mar;45(2):145-66
pubmed: 23168093
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356
pubmed: 23271957
Reprod Health. 2013 Jan 15;10:3
pubmed: 23317173
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Mar 21;13:72
pubmed: 23517021
Cult Health Sex. 2014;16(1):61-75
pubmed: 24236953
Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(6):673-9
pubmed: 24479424
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3(2):77-88
pubmed: 24753853
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3(4):257-66
pubmed: 24753875
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):411-26
pubmed: 25801630
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):13827-32
pubmed: 26504213
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Oct;31(8):964-9
pubmed: 27122486
Cult Health Sex. 2017 Jan;19(1):76-90
pubmed: 27426679
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 23;11(9):e0163653
pubmed: 27661617
Cult Health Sex. 2017 Sep;19(9):1024-1037
pubmed: 28276923
Cult Health Sex. 2017 Dec;19(12):1344-1359
pubmed: 28415961
Cult Health Sex. 2018 May;20(5):516-530
pubmed: 28812445
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Aug 2;18(1):133
pubmed: 30068320
Reprod Health. 2018 Sep 12;15(1):151
pubmed: 30208896
Eur J Popul. 2017 Jan 17;33(1):129-152
pubmed: 30976229
Patient Educ Couns. 1997 May;31(1):39-48
pubmed: 9197801
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Apr;46(7):891-9
pubmed: 9541074