Saliva Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for Targeted Screening of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.
Cytomegalovirus
/ isolation & purification
Cytomegalovirus Infections
/ congenital
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Mass Screening
/ methods
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
/ methods
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
Saliva
/ virology
Sensitivity and Specificity
congenital
cytomegalovirus
saliva
targeted screening
Journal
The Journal of infectious diseases
ISSN: 1537-6613
Titre abrégé: J Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0413675
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 10 2019
22 10 2019
Historique:
received:
21
04
2019
accepted:
14
07
2019
pubmed:
17
7
2019
medline:
20
5
2020
entrez:
17
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Saliva real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was shown to be sensitive and specific for the detection of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) in universal screening studies. In the current study, we assessed the performance of saliva real-time PCR in newborns undergoing targeted cCMV screening. Saliva real-time PCR results were prospectively correlated with reference-standard urine detection in newborns undergoing targeted cCMV screening over a 3-year period, in successive validation (concurrent testing of all saliva and urine specimens) and routine-screening (confirmatory urine testing of positive saliva results) implementation phases. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of saliva real-time PCR were 98.3% (95% confidence interval, 90.8%-99.9%), 91.5% (89.3%-93.3%), 45.6% (36.7%-54.7%), and 99.9% (99.2%-99.9%), respectively, in 856 concurrently tested newborns. True-positive saliva real-time PCR detection (defined in relation to urine detection) was associated with earlier saliva sampling (P = .002) and a higher saliva viral load (P < .001). We further identified a saliva viral load cutoff value that reliably distinguished between true-positive and false-positive saliva results. In newborns undergoing targeted screening for cCMV, saliva real-time PCR is highly sensitive yet has a low positive predictive value, necessitating confirmatory testing. Early sampling and application of a validated viral load cutoff could improve the assay performance and support its large-scale implementation in this growing clinical setting.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Saliva real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was shown to be sensitive and specific for the detection of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) in universal screening studies. In the current study, we assessed the performance of saliva real-time PCR in newborns undergoing targeted cCMV screening.
METHODS
Saliva real-time PCR results were prospectively correlated with reference-standard urine detection in newborns undergoing targeted cCMV screening over a 3-year period, in successive validation (concurrent testing of all saliva and urine specimens) and routine-screening (confirmatory urine testing of positive saliva results) implementation phases.
RESULTS
The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of saliva real-time PCR were 98.3% (95% confidence interval, 90.8%-99.9%), 91.5% (89.3%-93.3%), 45.6% (36.7%-54.7%), and 99.9% (99.2%-99.9%), respectively, in 856 concurrently tested newborns. True-positive saliva real-time PCR detection (defined in relation to urine detection) was associated with earlier saliva sampling (P = .002) and a higher saliva viral load (P < .001). We further identified a saliva viral load cutoff value that reliably distinguished between true-positive and false-positive saliva results.
CONCLUSIONS
In newborns undergoing targeted screening for cCMV, saliva real-time PCR is highly sensitive yet has a low positive predictive value, necessitating confirmatory testing. Early sampling and application of a validated viral load cutoff could improve the assay performance and support its large-scale implementation in this growing clinical setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31310307
pii: 5532655
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz373
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1790-1796Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.