Genome-wide association analysis for β-hydroxybutyrate concentration in Milk in Holstein dairy cattle.
Clinical/subclinical ketosis
Dairy cattle
Genome-wide association
MIR spectroscopy
Milk BHB concentrations
Journal
BMC genetics
ISSN: 1471-2156
Titre abrégé: BMC Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 07 2019
16 07 2019
Historique:
received:
22
10
2018
accepted:
28
06
2019
entrez:
18
7
2019
pubmed:
18
7
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ketosis in dairy cattle has been shown to cause a high morbidity in the farm and substantial financial losses to dairy farmers. Ketosis symptoms, however, are difficult to identify, therefore, the amount of ketone bodies (mainly β-hydroxybutyric acid, BHB) is used as an indicator of subclinical ketosis in cows. It has also been shown that milk BHB concentrations have a strong correlation with ketosis in dairy cattle. Mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR) has recently became a fast, cheap and high-throughput method for analyzing milk components. The aim of this study was to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on the MIR-predicted milk BHB to identify genomic regions, genes and pathways potentially affecting subclinical ketosis in North American Holstein dairy cattle. Several significant regions were identified associated with MIR-predicted milk BHB concentrations (indicator of subclinical ketosis) in the first lactation (SCK1) and second and later lactations (SCK2) in Holstein dairy cows. The strongest association was located on BTA6 for SCK1 and BTA14 on SCK2. Several SNPs on BTA6 were identified in regions and variants reported previously to be associated with susceptibility to ketosis and clinical mastitis in Jersey and Holstein dairy cattle, respectively. One highly significant SNP on BTA14 was found within the DGAT1 gene with known functions on fat metabolism and inflammatory response in dairy cattle. A region on BTA6 and three SNPs on BTA20 were found to overlap between SCK1 and SCK2. However, a novel region on BTA20 (55-63 Mb) for SCK2 was also identified, which was not reported in previous association studies. Enrichment analysis of the list of candidate genes within the identified regions for MIR-predicted milk BHB concentrations yielded molecular functions and biological processes that may be involved in the inflammatory response and lipid metabolism in dairy cattle. The results of this study confirmed several SNPs and genes identified in previous studies as associated with ketosis susceptibility and immune response, and also found a novel region that can be used for further analysis to identify causal variations and key regulatory genes that affect clinical/ subclinical ketosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ketosis in dairy cattle has been shown to cause a high morbidity in the farm and substantial financial losses to dairy farmers. Ketosis symptoms, however, are difficult to identify, therefore, the amount of ketone bodies (mainly β-hydroxybutyric acid, BHB) is used as an indicator of subclinical ketosis in cows. It has also been shown that milk BHB concentrations have a strong correlation with ketosis in dairy cattle. Mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR) has recently became a fast, cheap and high-throughput method for analyzing milk components. The aim of this study was to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on the MIR-predicted milk BHB to identify genomic regions, genes and pathways potentially affecting subclinical ketosis in North American Holstein dairy cattle.
RESULTS
Several significant regions were identified associated with MIR-predicted milk BHB concentrations (indicator of subclinical ketosis) in the first lactation (SCK1) and second and later lactations (SCK2) in Holstein dairy cows. The strongest association was located on BTA6 for SCK1 and BTA14 on SCK2. Several SNPs on BTA6 were identified in regions and variants reported previously to be associated with susceptibility to ketosis and clinical mastitis in Jersey and Holstein dairy cattle, respectively. One highly significant SNP on BTA14 was found within the DGAT1 gene with known functions on fat metabolism and inflammatory response in dairy cattle. A region on BTA6 and three SNPs on BTA20 were found to overlap between SCK1 and SCK2. However, a novel region on BTA20 (55-63 Mb) for SCK2 was also identified, which was not reported in previous association studies. Enrichment analysis of the list of candidate genes within the identified regions for MIR-predicted milk BHB concentrations yielded molecular functions and biological processes that may be involved in the inflammatory response and lipid metabolism in dairy cattle.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study confirmed several SNPs and genes identified in previous studies as associated with ketosis susceptibility and immune response, and also found a novel region that can be used for further analysis to identify causal variations and key regulatory genes that affect clinical/ subclinical ketosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31311492
doi: 10.1186/s12863-019-0761-9
pii: 10.1186/s12863-019-0761-9
pmc: PMC6636026
doi:
Substances chimiques
3-Hydroxybutyric Acid
TZP1275679
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
58Références
J Dairy Sci. 1992 Sep;75(9):2549-59
pubmed: 1452859
Prog Lipid Res. 2009 Jan;48(1):27-43
pubmed: 19017534
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):4273-7
pubmed: 3108890
Anim Genet. 2013 Feb;44(1):1-8
pubmed: 22497605
BMC Genomics. 2012 May 20;13:193
pubmed: 22607119
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Dec;74(12):4358-65
pubmed: 1787205
BMC Genet. 2016 Aug 02;17:114
pubmed: 27485317
J Anim Sci. 2008 Nov;86(11):2903-12
pubmed: 18599666
Mol Biol Cell. 2012 Aug;23(15):2831-44
pubmed: 22696684
J Proteome Res. 2012 Feb 3;11(2):1373-81
pubmed: 22098372
Eur J Biochem. 1997 Feb 15;244(1):1-14
pubmed: 9063439
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(8):1184-91
pubmed: 19617889
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4383-92
pubmed: 18946144
Cent Eur J Immunol. 2015;40(3):373-9
pubmed: 26648784
J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):2925-38
pubmed: 23497997
J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3364-70
pubmed: 24657085
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Sep;93(9):4351-8
pubmed: 20723708
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Apr;89(4):1189-94
pubmed: 16537952
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Mar;86(3):999-1008
pubmed: 12703637
BMC Genet. 2016 Jun 21;17(1):88
pubmed: 27328805
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Feb;96(2):1030-7
pubmed: 23261386
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jan;96(1):668-78
pubmed: 23063157
Cell Prolif. 2008 Dec;41(6):936-59
pubmed: 19040571
Biosci Rep. 2014 Jun 25;34(3):
pubmed: 24877606
Genetics. 2014 May;197(1):285-9
pubmed: 24561481
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Nov;74(11):3985-93
pubmed: 1757637
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Aug;89(8):3164-74
pubmed: 16840633
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 May;34(3):281-9
pubmed: 21316109
J Dairy Sci. 2013 May;96(5):3285-95
pubmed: 23497994
Hepatology. 2006 Sep;44(3):581-91
pubmed: 16941682
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Nov 09;11:103
pubmed: 24209779
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0114919
pubmed: 25658712
Adv Immunol. 2014;124:17-66
pubmed: 25175772
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Dec 16;1317(3):192-8
pubmed: 8988235
Anim Health Res Rev. 2009 Jun;10(1):53-63
pubmed: 19558749
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6312-6326
pubmed: 28571989
Vet Q. 1998 Jul;20(3):108-10
pubmed: 9684300
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jan;101(1):413-424
pubmed: 29128227
J Reprod Dev. 2010 Jan;56 Suppl:S29-35
pubmed: 20629214
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Feb;94(2):971-80
pubmed: 21257065
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Nov;82(11):2259-73
pubmed: 10575597
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5056-5066
pubmed: 22916909
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1171-86
pubmed: 24440251
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Dec;92(12):5769-801
pubmed: 19923585
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D481-7
pubmed: 26656494
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Oct;24(7):644-9
pubmed: 23566943
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Feb;78(2):421-30
pubmed: 7745163
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800
pubmed: 21789182
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4816-4825
pubmed: 27016835
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7547-63
pubmed: 25306269
Physiol Genomics. 2015 Apr;47(4):129-37
pubmed: 25670729
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0122325
pubmed: 25789767
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Apr;93(4):1702-12
pubmed: 20338448
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Mar;99(3):1990-1998
pubmed: 26774726
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Apr;95(4):1807-20
pubmed: 22459829
Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Jan 30;144(3-4):60-71
pubmed: 24378117
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Oct 19;48(1):79
pubmed: 27760518
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Sep;99(9):6855-6873
pubmed: 27372587
Nat Med. 2015 Jul;21(7):677-87
pubmed: 26121197
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Nov;1861(11):1643-1651
pubmed: 27476102
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Nov;95(11):6781-7
pubmed: 22939798
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5357-5364
pubmed: 22916942
Physiol Genomics. 2009 Sep 9;39(1):1-13
pubmed: 19567787
Cell Death Dis. 2015 Feb 05;6:e1630
pubmed: 25654763
Genomics. 2002 Jul;80(1):113-23
pubmed: 12079290
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1041-9
pubmed: 20172224
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 15;7:302
pubmed: 16776819
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000;480:209-16
pubmed: 10959429
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 17;15:478
pubmed: 24935670
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:55
pubmed: 20043827
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Mar;100(3):2032-2041
pubmed: 28088411
Genome Res. 2002 Feb;12(2):222-31
pubmed: 11827942
Hypertension. 2008 Nov;52(5):828-32
pubmed: 18838623
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):571-80
pubmed: 19164667
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
pubmed: 18946147
BMC Genet. 2016 Jun 10;17(1):75
pubmed: 27287773
BMC Genet. 2015 Sep 15;16:111
pubmed: 26370837
BMC Genet. 2012 Mar 26;13:21
pubmed: 22449276
Vet World. 2016 Nov;9(11):1242-1247
pubmed: 27956776
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157774
pubmed: 27310007
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):7286-92
pubmed: 25218753