Ultraconserved element (UCE) probe set design: Base genome and initial design parameters critical for optimization.
bait design
genomics
phylogenetics
phylogenomics
probe design
ultraconserved elements
Journal
Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
08
04
2019
revised:
26
04
2019
accepted:
28
04
2019
entrez:
18
7
2019
pubmed:
18
7
2019
medline:
18
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Targeted capture and enrichment approaches have proven effective for phylogenetic study. Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) in particular have exhibited great utility for phylogenomic analyses, with the software package phyluce being among the most utilized pipelines for UCE phylogenomics, including probe design. Despite the success of UCEs, it is becoming increasing apparent that diverse lineages require probe sets tailored to focal taxa in order to improve locus recovery. However, factors affecting probe design and methods for optimizing probe sets to focal taxa remain underexplored. Here, we use newly available beetle (Coleoptera) genomic resources to investigate factors affecting UCE probe set design using phyluce. In particular, we explore the effects of stringency during initial design steps, as well as base genome choice on resulting probe sets and locus recovery. We found that both base genome choice and initial bait design stringency parameters greatly alter the number of resultant probes included in final probe sets and strongly affect the number of loci detected and recovered during in silico testing of these probe sets. In addition, we identify attributes of base genomes that correlated with high performance in probe design. Ultimately, we provide a recommended workflow for using phyluce to design an optimized UCE probe set that will work across a targeted lineage, and use our findings to develop a new, open-source UCE probe set for beetles of the suborder Adephaga.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31312430
doi: 10.1002/ece3.5260
pii: ECE35260
pmc: PMC6617817
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.2f62927']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
6933-6948Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : K12 GM063651
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Genome Biol. 2009;10(10):R116
pubmed: 19835619
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Biotechniques. 2012 Feb;52(2):87-94
pubmed: 22313406
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54848
pubmed: 23382987
Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 Mar;18(2):281-295
pubmed: 29131534
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Nov;17(6):1342-1358
pubmed: 28258659
Genome Res. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-54
pubmed: 22207614
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):564-77
pubmed: 17654362
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52
pubmed: 10742046
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1875-86
pubmed: 27009209
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Dec;28(12):3237-52
pubmed: 21680872
Appl Plant Sci. 2016 Jul 12;4(7):
pubmed: 27437175
Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 Mar;18(2):356-361
pubmed: 28941033
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 1;26(5):589-95
pubmed: 20080505
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 May 17;284(1854):
pubmed: 28469029
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 May;17(3):508-522
pubmed: 27566552
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jul;17(4):812-823
pubmed: 27768256
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Jun;63(3):533-76
pubmed: 22421212
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3
pubmed: 24451623
Biotechniques. 2013 Jun;54(6):321-6
pubmed: 23758502
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Jan;118:204-221
pubmed: 28951253
Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7
pubmed: 10827456
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Feb;66(2):526-38
pubmed: 22197804
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Jan;16(1):42-55
pubmed: 25925277
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e65923
pubmed: 23824177
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Nov;17(6):1183-1201
pubmed: 28199781
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Sep;16(5):1051-8
pubmed: 27454358
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Sep;17(5):1003-1008
pubmed: 28118515
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 15;9(1):205
pubmed: 29335414
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Feb 19;16:43
pubmed: 26896057
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0188044
pubmed: 29166661
BMC Ecol. 2018 Jul 12;18(1):21
pubmed: 30001194
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 7;281(1790):
pubmed: 25030982
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 1;31(19):3210-2
pubmed: 26059717
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Sep;16(5):1189-203
pubmed: 26391430
BMC Biol. 2012 Jul 27;10:65
pubmed: 22839781
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):8619
pubmed: 28831048
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 May;15(3):489-501
pubmed: 25207863
Biol Lett. 2012 Oct 23;8(5):783-6
pubmed: 22593086
Syst Biol. 2016 Jul;65(4):640-50
pubmed: 26821912
Biol Lett. 2017 Sep;13(9):
pubmed: 28904179
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):2308-2321
pubmed: 28934378
Syst Biol. 2012 Oct;61(5):717-26
pubmed: 22232343
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268-74
pubmed: 25371430
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0143929
pubmed: 26716693
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Feb;119:128-143
pubmed: 29111477
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Aug;24(2):228-48
pubmed: 12144759
BMC Evol Biol. 2015 Dec 04;15:271
pubmed: 26637372
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 1;32(17):i552-i558
pubmed: 27587674
Evolution. 2017 Feb;71(2):475-488
pubmed: 27886369
Bioinformatics. 2016 Mar 1;32(5):786-8
pubmed: 26530724
Genome Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):936-9
pubmed: 20980556
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Nat Methods. 2010 Feb;7(2):111-8
pubmed: 20111037
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0161531
pubmed: 27556533
Zool Scr. 2009;38(1):43-62
pubmed: 19789725
Ecol Evol. 2019 Jun 11;9(12):6933-6948
pubmed: 31312430
Syst Biol. 2014 Jan 1;63(1):83-95
pubmed: 24021724