Influence of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food.


Journal

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 09 05 2019
accepted: 11 07 2019
pubmed: 18 7 2019
medline: 7 1 2020
entrez: 18 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Eating-related problems are among the most frequent issues in olfactory impairment, causing a noticeable loss of quality of life for some of the affected persons. To what extent olfactory dysfunction impacts on the sensory perception of food is less explored. The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of olfactory dysfunction on the perception of food aromas, as well as the perception of the "basic tastes" salty, sour, sweet, and bitter. Eighty-nine participants were recruited for the prospective study. Group 1 consisted of thoroughly examined patients with olfactory dysfunction (n = 48, mean age = 60.0 years), group 2 consisted of people with normal olfactory function (n = 41, mean age = 50.4 years). First, olfactory and gustatory functions were assessed for all participants with the help of the "Sniffin'Sticks" battery and the "taste strips" test. Second, food odors were rated for their pleasantness, intensity, familiarity and desirability. Last, real food items were tasted orally and the intensity for basic taste qualities (sweet, bitter, salty, and sour) and pleasantness was rated. In addition, salivation was measured following exposure to the food odors. In comparison to controls, patients rated orthonasal food odors as less pleasant, intense, familiar, and less appetizing. "Taste strip" scores were significantly lower in patients (M = 9.56, SD = 2.76) as compared to controls (M = 10.88, SD = 1.89). In addition, ratings of food liking for chocolate and peanut were lower in patients compared to controls (chocolate: patients-M = 6.85, SD = 2.09, controls-M = 7.90, SD = 1.53; peanut: patients-M = 4.88, SD = 2.20, controls-M = 6.80, SD = 2.33). No significant differences were found regarding the comparison of the salivary flow rate in controls (M = 0.52 g/min, SD = 0.19) and patients (M = 0.50 SD = 0.17). Changes in the perception of odors may change the perception of food with specific effects on food liking. Olfactory dysfunction affects gustatory function, indicating the central-nervous interaction between taste and smell. Still, olfactory dysfunction did not appear to affect patients' salivary flow.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31312923
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05558-7
pii: 10.1007/s00405-019-05558-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2811-2817

Références

Chem Senses. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-20
pubmed: 19942579
Chem Senses. 2011 Jan;36(2):189-98
pubmed: 20978137
Physiol Behav. 2017 May 15;174:35-41
pubmed: 28259807
Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Aug;92:90-95
pubmed: 29778624
J Neurol. 2009 Feb;256(2):242-8
pubmed: 19221845
Appetite. 2001 Dec;37(3):251-2
pubmed: 11895327
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 May;38(5):650-6
pubmed: 23917805
Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Feb;125(2):116-21
pubmed: 15880938
Chem Senses. 1997 Feb;22(1):39-52
pubmed: 9056084
Cell. 2015 Mar 26;161(1):24-35
pubmed: 25815982
Behav Neurosci. 2009 Jun;123(3):481-9
pubmed: 19485554
Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):316-21
pubmed: 17108956
Chem Senses. 2014 Mar;39(3):185-94
pubmed: 24429163
J Neurol. 2010 Aug;257(8):1303-8
pubmed: 20221768
Laryngorhinootologie. 2007 Sep;86(9):640-3
pubmed: 17806002
Rhinology. 2016 Jan 31;56(1):1-30
pubmed: 28623665
Ann Neurol. 2017 Sep;82(3):360-370
pubmed: 28796326
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jan 3;411(1):6-10
pubmed: 17110032
Laryngoscope. 2008 Jan;118(1):135-44
pubmed: 17975508
Perception. 1979;8(3):339-46
pubmed: 534160

Auteurs

Y Zang (Y)

Interdisciplinary Center Smell and Taste, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Affiliated Hospital XUZHOU Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

P Han (P)

Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

S Burghardt (S)

Interdisciplinary Center Smell and Taste, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

A Knaapila (A)

Department of Pedriatric Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Common Matters, Helsinki, Finland.

V Schriever (V)

Interdisciplinary Center Smell and Taste, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

T Hummel (T)

Interdisciplinary Center Smell and Taste, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. thummel@mail.zih.tu-dresden.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH