Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anal Canal
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Feasibility Studies
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Laparoscopy
/ methods
Male
Margins of Excision
Metabolism, Inborn Errors
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Operative Time
Organ Sparing Treatments
/ methods
Rectal Neoplasms
/ surgery
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Sex Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Laparoscopic
Rectal cancer
Robotic
Sphincter-saving procedure
Total mesorectal excision
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
17
06
2019
accepted:
08
07
2019
pubmed:
18
7
2019
medline:
15
9
2020
entrez:
18
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of our study was to compare long term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision (TME) in male patients with mid-low rectal cancer (RC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). The study was conducted as a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database, and we analyzed 14 robotic and 65 laparoscopic sphincter-saving TME (R-TME and L-TME, respectively) performed by one surgeon between 2005 and 2013. Patient characteristics, perioperative recovery, postoperative complications and pathology results were compared between the two groups. The patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Median operating time was longer in the R-TME than in the L-TME group (182 min versus 140 min). Only two conversions occurred in the L-TME group. No difference was found between groups regarding perioperative recovery and postoperative complication rates. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the RTME than in the L-TME group (32 versus 23, p = 0.008). The median circumferential margin (CRM) was 10 mm in the R-TME group, 6.5 mm in the L-TME group (p = 0.047. The median distal resection margin (DRM) was 27.5 mm in the R-TME, 15 mm in the L-TME group (p = 0.014). Macroscopic grading of the specimen in the R-TME group was complete in all patients. In the L-TME group, grading was complete in 52 (80%) and incomplete in 13 (20%) cases (p = 0.109). Median follow-up 87 months (1-152). Whereas local recurrence was seen in eight cases (10.12%) and distant metastasis was seen in 18 cases (22.7%). Overall, 5 years survival was 83.3% in R-TME, 75% in L-TME groups. R-TME is a safe and feasible procedure that facilitates performing of TME in male patients with mid to low RC after NCRT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31313071
doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01001-5
pii: 10.1007/s11701-019-01001-5
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM