The Role of Cohabitating Partner and Relationship Characteristics on Physical Activity among Individuals with Osteoarthritis.
Exercise
Osteoarthritis
Social support
Spouses
Journal
International journal of behavioral medicine
ISSN: 1532-7558
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9421097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
18
7
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
entrez:
18
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Most individuals with knee or hip osteoarthritis do not meet recommendations for physical activity. The Social Cognitive Theory suggests that the social environment (e.g., spouses/partners) may influence the physical activity of individuals with osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the physical activity of insufficiently active, coupled adults with osteoarthritis was associated with received partner support for physical activity, partner's engagement in physical activity, and relationship satisfaction. Cross-sectional data from 169 couples were collected. Accelerometers estimated moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and daily steps for participants with osteoarthritis and their partners. Participants with osteoarthritis reported total received partner support for physical activity and relationship satisfaction. Participants with osteoarthritis were on average 65 years old, 65% female, 86% non-Hispanic white, and 47% retired. Receiving total partner support more frequently was associated with more minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity but not with steps. Relationship satisfaction moderated the association of partner's physical activity on the daily steps of individuals with osteoarthritis such that having a partner who accomplished more daily steps was associated with participants with osteoarthritis accomplishing more daily steps themselves when they reported greater relationship satisfaction. Partners and relationship satisfaction may play an important role in the physical activity of individuals with osteoarthritis. Interventions seeking to increase physical activity in this population may be enhanced by promoting partner support. Additional research is needed to further explain these associations within the context of relationship satisfaction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Most individuals with knee or hip osteoarthritis do not meet recommendations for physical activity. The Social Cognitive Theory suggests that the social environment (e.g., spouses/partners) may influence the physical activity of individuals with osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the physical activity of insufficiently active, coupled adults with osteoarthritis was associated with received partner support for physical activity, partner's engagement in physical activity, and relationship satisfaction.
METHODS
METHODS
Cross-sectional data from 169 couples were collected. Accelerometers estimated moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and daily steps for participants with osteoarthritis and their partners. Participants with osteoarthritis reported total received partner support for physical activity and relationship satisfaction.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Participants with osteoarthritis were on average 65 years old, 65% female, 86% non-Hispanic white, and 47% retired. Receiving total partner support more frequently was associated with more minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity but not with steps. Relationship satisfaction moderated the association of partner's physical activity on the daily steps of individuals with osteoarthritis such that having a partner who accomplished more daily steps was associated with participants with osteoarthritis accomplishing more daily steps themselves when they reported greater relationship satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Partners and relationship satisfaction may play an important role in the physical activity of individuals with osteoarthritis. Interventions seeking to increase physical activity in this population may be enhanced by promoting partner support. Additional research is needed to further explain these associations within the context of relationship satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31313250
doi: 10.1007/s12529-019-09806-2
pii: 10.1007/s12529-019-09806-2
pmc: PMC7147336
mid: NIHMS1573944
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
522-530Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P60AR062760
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : T32NR007091
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P60 AR064166
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : T32 NR007091
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P30 AR072580
Pays : United States
Références
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Jan;29(1):80-94
pubmed: 24917590
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2013 Mar;5(1):28-78
pubmed: 23281315
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jul;70(7):1005-1011
pubmed: 29045051
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:77-86
pubmed: 26330661
Am J Public Health. 1994 Mar;84(3):351-8
pubmed: 8129049
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8
pubmed: 18091006
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1369-80
pubmed: 16146666
Health Psychol. 2003 Sep;22(5):453-63
pubmed: 14570528
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Nov;21(11):1648-59
pubmed: 23948979
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun 15;59(6):849-56
pubmed: 18512720
Chest. 2017 May;151(5):1028-1038
pubmed: 28087303
J Pers Assess. 2009 Mar;91(2):121-36
pubmed: 19205933
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012 May;25(3):291-307
pubmed: 21623480
Prev Med. 2003 Nov;37(5):520-8
pubmed: 14572437
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 17;13(1):e28
pubmed: 21441100
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(6):781-9
pubmed: 10459889
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):272-81
pubmed: 22818939
Psychol Bull. 1995 Nov;118(3):392-404
pubmed: 7501743
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Mar;44(3):332-344
pubmed: 29121824
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Apr;69(4):475-483
pubmed: 28029748
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):859-70
pubmed: 20178694
Prev Med. 1987 Nov;16(6):825-36
pubmed: 3432232
J Rural Health. 2009 Spring;25(2):211-8
pubmed: 19785589
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999 Nov;54(6):S356-67
pubmed: 10625971
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
pubmed: 3068365
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;68(7):1582-7
pubmed: 27015600
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Jun;43(6):701-12
pubmed: 24387819
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 15;292(6522):746-50
pubmed: 3082422
J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(11):1389-1404
pubmed: 27469008
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Mar 1;183(5):444-51
pubmed: 26337074
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Aug 15;61(8):1087-94
pubmed: 19644901
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;20(6 Suppl 2):40-7
pubmed: 1866629
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Sep;57(5):P387-95
pubmed: 12198097
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Sep;66(9):1328-36
pubmed: 24923633
Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2673-80
pubmed: 24952110
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Apr;45(2):213-23
pubmed: 23161472
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Feb;43(2):357-64
pubmed: 20581716
Health Psychol. 2017 Jun;36(6):568-576
pubmed: 28277696
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Dec;34(12):1996-2001
pubmed: 12471307
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Sep;68(5):794-806
pubmed: 23873967
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Sep;21(3):677-93
pubmed: 27159040
Front Public Health. 2018 Jul 18;6:197
pubmed: 30073160
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Sep;35(9):1529-36
pubmed: 12972873
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Nov;24(6):827-39
pubmed: 25807856