Which community-based HIV initiatives are effective in achieving UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets? A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence (2007-2018).


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 07 12 2018
accepted: 02 07 2019
entrez: 18 7 2019
pubmed: 18 7 2019
medline: 3 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Reaching the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 90-90-90 targets to end the HIV epidemic relies on effective interventions that engage untested HIV+ individuals and retain them in care. Evidence on community-based interventions through the lens of the targets has not yet been synthesized, reflecting a knowledge gap. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to shed light on successful community-based interventions that have been effective in contributing, directly or indirectly, towards the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets: knowledge of HIV status, linkage to care/on treatment, and viral suppression. Linkage to care was also included in this review due to the limitations of studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the period 2007-2018. Eleven databases were searched to identify community-based interventions designed to improve knowledge of HIV status (in particular HIV testing), linkage to care/on treatment, and/or viral suppression. Eligible studies were classified by intervention, population, country income level, outcomes and success. Success was defined as interventions demonstrating statistical significance between intervention and control group or that reached any target by proportion; 90% testing, 81% linked to care/on treatment and 73% viral suppression. Of 82 eligible studies, 51.2% (42/82) reported on HIV testing (first 90), 20.7% (17/82) on linkage to care/ on treatment (second 90), and 45.1% (37/82) on viral suppression (third 90). In all, 67.1% (55/82) of studies reported success; 21 studies on the first 90, 9 towards linkage to care/on treatment, and 25 towards the third. By strategies, 36.6% deployed community workers/peers, 22% used combined test and treat strategies, 12.2% used educational methods, 8.5% used mobile testing, 7.3% used campaigns and 13.4% used technology. For HIV testing/linkage, combined test/treat interventions were often used, for viral suppression, educational interventions and technologies were commonly deployed. Our pooled analysis suggested that deployment of community health care workers/peer workers significantly improved viral suppression (pooled OR: 1.40 95% CI 1.06-1.86). Of the studies published after 2014, 50.0% reported metrics aligned with UNAIDS targets. Data on linkage to care/on treatment (second target) remained weak, because many studies reported successes on the first and third targets. Stratification by targets and country income levels is informative and guides adaptation of successful interventions in comparable settings. Consistent reporting of clear metrics aligned with UNAIDS targets will aid in synergy of study data with programmatic data that will help reportage. Exploration of innovative interventions, for engagement and linkage and deployment of community/ peer workers is strongly encouraged.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Reaching the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 90-90-90 targets to end the HIV epidemic relies on effective interventions that engage untested HIV+ individuals and retain them in care. Evidence on community-based interventions through the lens of the targets has not yet been synthesized, reflecting a knowledge gap. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to shed light on successful community-based interventions that have been effective in contributing, directly or indirectly, towards the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets: knowledge of HIV status, linkage to care/on treatment, and viral suppression. Linkage to care was also included in this review due to the limitations of studies.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the period 2007-2018. Eleven databases were searched to identify community-based interventions designed to improve knowledge of HIV status (in particular HIV testing), linkage to care/on treatment, and/or viral suppression. Eligible studies were classified by intervention, population, country income level, outcomes and success. Success was defined as interventions demonstrating statistical significance between intervention and control group or that reached any target by proportion; 90% testing, 81% linked to care/on treatment and 73% viral suppression.
RESULTS
Of 82 eligible studies, 51.2% (42/82) reported on HIV testing (first 90), 20.7% (17/82) on linkage to care/ on treatment (second 90), and 45.1% (37/82) on viral suppression (third 90). In all, 67.1% (55/82) of studies reported success; 21 studies on the first 90, 9 towards linkage to care/on treatment, and 25 towards the third. By strategies, 36.6% deployed community workers/peers, 22% used combined test and treat strategies, 12.2% used educational methods, 8.5% used mobile testing, 7.3% used campaigns and 13.4% used technology. For HIV testing/linkage, combined test/treat interventions were often used, for viral suppression, educational interventions and technologies were commonly deployed. Our pooled analysis suggested that deployment of community health care workers/peer workers significantly improved viral suppression (pooled OR: 1.40 95% CI 1.06-1.86). Of the studies published after 2014, 50.0% reported metrics aligned with UNAIDS targets.
CONCLUSIONS
Data on linkage to care/on treatment (second target) remained weak, because many studies reported successes on the first and third targets. Stratification by targets and country income levels is informative and guides adaptation of successful interventions in comparable settings. Consistent reporting of clear metrics aligned with UNAIDS targets will aid in synergy of study data with programmatic data that will help reportage. Exploration of innovative interventions, for engagement and linkage and deployment of community/ peer workers is strongly encouraged.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31314764
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219826
pii: PONE-D-18-35093
pmc: PMC6636761
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0219826

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : 137872
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT 153149
Pays : Canada

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Public Health Rep. 2014 Jul-Aug;129(4):328-34
pubmed: 24982535
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 May 1;54(1):85-92
pubmed: 20418724
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Aug 01;17:19032
pubmed: 25095831
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 02;15:601
pubmed: 26136116
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 21;15:16
pubmed: 25604750
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jul;68(7):675-8
pubmed: 24700578
Nurs Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;61(5):353-62
pubmed: 22872107
J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Oct;16(5):798-810
pubmed: 23512324
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Dec;55(4):483-90
pubmed: 20683336
Int J Public Health. 2014 Jun;59(3):509-17
pubmed: 24589725
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 26;14:1226
pubmed: 25427749
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Dec;55(6):765-73
pubmed: 25223476
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e103146
pubmed: 25050797
J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Jun 08;18:19843
pubmed: 26058983
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 21;15:24
pubmed: 25603914
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017604
pubmed: 29101138
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Oct 1;49(2):190-5
pubmed: 18769349
AIDS Care. 2017 Aug;29(8):1003-1013
pubmed: 28150501
AIDS Educ Prev. 2014 Aug;26(4):317-27
pubmed: 25068179
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014 Jul;26(4):349-57
pubmed: 24871816
HIV Med. 2014 Jul;15(6):367-72
pubmed: 24251725
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Oct 1;61(2):e13-7
pubmed: 22659650
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 Aug 1;69(4):e127-34
pubmed: 25984711
Int J Public Health. 2015 Jan;60(1):121-6
pubmed: 25224831
Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;28(1):1-10
pubmed: 19210012
AIDS Care. 2012;24(10):1308-15
pubmed: 22621288
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2016 Oct;13(5):241-55
pubmed: 27475643
PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 25;14(7):e1002357
pubmed: 28742880
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0162085
pubmed: 27706150
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Aug 15;48(5):611-9
pubmed: 18645509
AIDS Behav. 2010 Jun;14(3):721-30
pubmed: 19370409
AIDS. 2011 Mar 27;25(6):825-34
pubmed: 21252632
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Dec 1;61(4):e50-8
pubmed: 22842842
Nature. 2015 Dec 3;528(7580):S77-85
pubmed: 26633769
AIDS Behav. 2010 Jun;14(3):558-66
pubmed: 19763813
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105(7):1394-8
pubmed: 25973833
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2016 Dec;13(6):359-366
pubmed: 27739018
Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2080-2089
pubmed: 19939445
AIDS. 2014 Sep 10;28(14):2133-45
pubmed: 25062091
AIDS Behav. 2010 Jun;14(3):580-9
pubmed: 19771504
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Mar;21(3):
pubmed: 29508945
AIDS Behav. 2015 Jun;19 Suppl 2:163-76
pubmed: 25566763
AIDS Behav. 2008 Jul;12(4 Suppl):S54-62
pubmed: 18512141
AIDS Behav. 2011 Jul;15(5):919-29
pubmed: 20957423
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 04;14:1244
pubmed: 25471459
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011 Mar;25(3):153-61
pubmed: 21323532
J Urban Health. 2014 Jun;91(3):555-67
pubmed: 24744105
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40902
pubmed: 22815862
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 17;15:388
pubmed: 25887602
Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Sep 05;5(1):85
pubmed: 27593965
Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;16(3):14-27
pubmed: 23437496
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 02;5(6):e10923
pubmed: 20532194
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 20;14:1309
pubmed: 25526799
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Oct;55(2):245-52
pubmed: 20714273
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 May 1;45(1):102-7
pubmed: 17460473
AIDS Care. 2016;28(2):214-20
pubmed: 26329265
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 May;2(5):e267-77
pubmed: 25103167
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Oct 1;46(2):238-44
pubmed: 17693890
PLoS Med. 2017 May 2;14(5):e1002292
pubmed: 28464041
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013 Feb;27(2):96-102
pubmed: 23373664
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Oct;14(10):1226-32
pubmed: 19732408
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Mar;90(2):112-8
pubmed: 24234073
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41
pubmed: 20171303
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jan;105(1):85-90
pubmed: 25393202
Lancet. 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1838-45
pubmed: 21071074

Auteurs

Sailly Dave (S)

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Trevor Peter (T)

Clinton Health Access Initiative, Gaborone, Botswana.

Clare Fogarty (C)

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Nicolaos Karatzas (N)

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Nandi Belinsky (N)

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Nitika Pant Pai (N)

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH