Multi-modality imaging approach to bone tumors - State-of-the art.
Bone tumors
CT (computed tomography)
FDG PET/CT/MRI
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging)
Nuclear scan
Radiographs
X-rays
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
01
04
2019
revised:
28
05
2019
accepted:
28
05
2019
entrez:
19
7
2019
pubmed:
19
7
2019
medline:
19
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The approach to the radiographic diagnosis of bone tumors is much beyond the conventional radiographs in present era of multiplanar and functional imaging. Radiographs is still the most pertinent part of initial diagnosis of bone tumors, however, there are few limitations, like lesions in complex anatomy, marrow assessment, soft tissue resolution, which are important for staging. Diagnosis is just one aspect of the tumor evaluation, extent of marrow involvement by the tumor growth, involvement of overlying soft tissue, involvement of adjacent joint, and knowledge about skip lesions and metastasis are equally important for staging and treatment of the disease. Multimodality imaging like CT, MRI helps cover all these aspects. Emerging role of PETCT/PET MRI has further revolutionized the imaging of bone tumors by providing anatomical and morphological characteristics simultaneously and combining the whole body scan in same sitting. This article will discuss the role of various imaging modalities along with illustrative examples of few cases. Team work between radiologist with orthopedic oncologist and pathologist will help in deciding a road map for diagnosing and treatment of bone tumors. Follow up scanning with MRI and PET FDG scan has also been well established in assessing therapeutic response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31316240
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.05.022
pii: S0976-5662(19)30247-4
pmc: PMC6611851
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
687-701Références
Radiology. 2000 Jun;215 Suppl:261-4
pubmed: 11037436
J Nucl Med. 2000 Oct;41(10):1695-701
pubmed: 11038000
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Mar;15(3):302-7
pubmed: 11891975
J Nucl Med. 2002 Apr;43(4):510-8
pubmed: 11937595
Radiographics. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2):341-58
pubmed: 12640151
Br J Radiol. 1951 Feb;24(278):107-9
pubmed: 14812101
Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):493-502
pubmed: 15459325
Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Jun;35(6):555-64
pubmed: 15776228
Skeletal Radiol. 2005 Oct;34(10):632-8
pubmed: 16091963
Skeletal Radiol. 2006 Feb;35(2):78-87
pubmed: 16247641
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr;186(4):967-76
pubmed: 16554565
Radiat Med. 2007 Apr;25(3):94-105
pubmed: 17450333
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):662-74
pubmed: 18223119
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jun;10(6):606-14
pubmed: 19482249
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2011 Feb;19(1):159-80
pubmed: 21129640
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan;200(1):3-7
pubmed: 23255735
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 May;40(5):728-36
pubmed: 23361860
J Nucl Med. 2013 May;54(5):815-24
pubmed: 23492887
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):W521-31
pubmed: 24848845
Radiology. 1980 Mar;134(3):577-83
pubmed: 6928321
Radiol Clin North Am. 1981 Dec;19(4):715-48
pubmed: 7323290
Radiol Clin North Am. 1981 Dec;19(4):749-83
pubmed: 7323291
Radiol Clin North Am. 1981 Dec;19(4):785-814
pubmed: 7323292