Health monitoring among asylum seekers and refugees: a state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based study in Germany.
Asylum seekers
Health monitoring
Health status
Healthcare access
Healthcare planning
Healthcare quality
Refugees
Survey
Journal
Emerging themes in epidemiology
ISSN: 1742-7622
Titre abrégé: Emerg Themes Epidemiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
21
01
2019
accepted:
12
06
2019
entrez:
19
7
2019
pubmed:
19
7
2019
medline:
19
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health monitoring in Germany falls short on generating timely, reliable and representative data among migrants, especially transient and marginalized groups such as asylum seekers and refugees (ASR). We aim to advance current health monitoring approaches and obtain reliable estimates on health status and access to essential healthcare services among ASR in Germany's third largest federal state, Baden-Württemberg. We conducted a state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based health monitoring survey in nine languages among ASR and their children in collective accommodation centres in 44 districts. Questionnaire items capturing health status, access to care, and sociodemographic variables were taken from established surveys and translated using a team approach. Random sampling on the level of 1938 accommodation centres with 70,634 ASR was employed to draw a balanced sample of 65 centres with a net sample of 1% of the state's ASR population. Multilingual field teams recruited eligible participants using a "door-to-door" approach. Parents completed an additional questionnaire on behalf of their children. The final sample comprised 58 centres with 1843 ASR. Of the total sample expected eligible (N = 987), 41.7% (n = 412) participated in the survey. Overall, 157 households had children and received a children's questionnaire; 61% (n = 95) of these were returned. Age, sex, and nationality of the included sample were comparable to the total population of asylum applicants in Germany. Adults reported longstanding limitations (16%), bad/very bad general health (19%), pain (25%), chronic illness (40%), depression (46%), and anxiety (45%). 52% utilised primary and 37% specialist care services in the previous 12 months, while reporting unmet needs for primary (31%) and specialist care (32%). Younger and male participants had above-average health status and below-average utilisation compared to older and female ASR. Our health monitoring survey yielded reliable estimates on health status and health care access among ASR, revealing relevant morbidities and patterns of care. Applying rigorous epidemiological methods in linguistically diverse, transient and marginalized populations is challenging, but feasible. Integration of this approach into state- and nation-wide health monitoring strategies is needed in order to sustain this approach as a health planning tool.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health monitoring in Germany falls short on generating timely, reliable and representative data among migrants, especially transient and marginalized groups such as asylum seekers and refugees (ASR). We aim to advance current health monitoring approaches and obtain reliable estimates on health status and access to essential healthcare services among ASR in Germany's third largest federal state, Baden-Württemberg.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based health monitoring survey in nine languages among ASR and their children in collective accommodation centres in 44 districts. Questionnaire items capturing health status, access to care, and sociodemographic variables were taken from established surveys and translated using a team approach. Random sampling on the level of 1938 accommodation centres with 70,634 ASR was employed to draw a balanced sample of 65 centres with a net sample of 1% of the state's ASR population. Multilingual field teams recruited eligible participants using a "door-to-door" approach. Parents completed an additional questionnaire on behalf of their children.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The final sample comprised 58 centres with 1843 ASR. Of the total sample expected eligible (N = 987), 41.7% (n = 412) participated in the survey. Overall, 157 households had children and received a children's questionnaire; 61% (n = 95) of these were returned. Age, sex, and nationality of the included sample were comparable to the total population of asylum applicants in Germany. Adults reported longstanding limitations (16%), bad/very bad general health (19%), pain (25%), chronic illness (40%), depression (46%), and anxiety (45%). 52% utilised primary and 37% specialist care services in the previous 12 months, while reporting unmet needs for primary (31%) and specialist care (32%). Younger and male participants had above-average health status and below-average utilisation compared to older and female ASR.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our health monitoring survey yielded reliable estimates on health status and health care access among ASR, revealing relevant morbidities and patterns of care. Applying rigorous epidemiological methods in linguistically diverse, transient and marginalized populations is challenging, but feasible. Integration of this approach into state- and nation-wide health monitoring strategies is needed in order to sustain this approach as a health planning tool.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31316579
doi: 10.1186/s12982-019-0085-2
pii: 85
pmc: PMC6613239
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 03;14:1030
pubmed: 25278109
Health Policy. 2015 Nov;119(11):1415-23
pubmed: 26428441
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Apr;65(4):376-83
pubmed: 20515894
Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21
pubmed: 19996233
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8
pubmed: 25843827
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 04;5(11):e008784
pubmed: 26537498
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0131483
pubmed: 26201017
Health Policy. 2012 Apr;105(1):10-6
pubmed: 22277878
Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92
pubmed: 14583691
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):623-9
pubmed: 22000476
Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8
pubmed: 9626712
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Aug;16(4):420-8
pubmed: 16141303
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 09;15:502
pubmed: 26552375
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):451-61
pubmed: 25948659
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Oct;126:4-12
pubmed: 28916159
Psychiatry Res. 2016 May 30;239:245-52
pubmed: 27031595
J Community Health. 2012 Oct;37(5):1110-8
pubmed: 22382428
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):791-9
pubmed: 10433412
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 01;12:730
pubmed: 22938722
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 08;14(8):
pubmed: 28786927
Lancet. 2005 Apr 9-15;365(9467):1309-14
pubmed: 15823380
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):317-25
pubmed: 17339617
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Oct;75(10):643-51
pubmed: 23512466
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Jan 27;114(4):53-60
pubmed: 28211318
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
JAMA. 2005 Aug 3;294(5):602-12
pubmed: 16077055
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018 Jan;68(1):22-29
pubmed: 28470633