Machine learning predicts per-vessel early coronary revascularization after fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: results from multicentre REFINE SPECT registry.
SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
coronary artery disease
early coronary revascularization
explainable machine learning
new-generation cardiac camera
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2020
01 05 2020
Historique:
received:
31
10
2018
pubmed:
19
7
2019
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
19
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To optimize per-vessel prediction of early coronary revascularization (ECR) within 90 days after fast single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using machine learning (ML) and introduce a method for a patient-specific explanation of ML results in a clinical setting. A total of 1980 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent stress/rest 99mTc-sestamibi/tetrofosmin MPI with new-generation SPECT scanners were included. All patients had invasive coronary angiography within 6 months after SPECT MPI. ML utilized 18 clinical, 9 stress test, and 28 imaging variables to predict per-vessel and per-patient ECR with 10-fold cross-validation. Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of ML was compared with standard quantitative analysis [total perfusion deficit (TPD)] and expert interpretation. ECR was performed in 958 patients (48%). Per-vessel, the AUC of ECR prediction by ML (AUC 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.77, 0.80]) was higher than by regional stress TPD (0.71, [0.70, 0.73]), combined-view stress TPD (AUC 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.72]), or ischaemic TPD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI [0.71, 0.74]), all P < 0.001. Per-patient, the AUC of ECR prediction by ML (AUC 0.81, 95% CI [0.79, 0.83]) was higher than that of stress TPD, combined-view TPD, and ischaemic TPD, all P < 0.001. ML also outperformed nuclear cardiologists' expert interpretation of MPI for the prediction of early revascularization performance. A method to explain ML prediction for an individual patient was also developed. In patients with suspected CAD, the prediction of ECR by ML outperformed automatic MPI quantitation by TPDs (per-vessel and per-patient) or nuclear cardiologists' expert interpretation (per-patient).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31317178
pii: 5533091
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez177
pmc: PMC7167744
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
549-559Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL089765
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Clin Nucl Med. 2012 Oct;37(10):965-70
pubmed: 22955070
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):553-62
pubmed: 23703378
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):606-39
pubmed: 26914678
J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Apr;14(2):153-64
pubmed: 17386377
Ann Nucl Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):88-93
pubmed: 24343677
Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2900-7
pubmed: 12771008
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Jun 19;:
pubmed: 29923104
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1654-1663
pubmed: 29550305
J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Jun;21(3):478-85
pubmed: 24477404
J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(5):877-84
pubmed: 25480110
Nucl Med Commun. 2004 Jul;25(7):657-63
pubmed: 15208492
J Nucl Med. 2010 Nov;51(11):1724-31
pubmed: 20956478
Eur Heart J. 2017 Feb 14;38(7):500-507
pubmed: 27252451
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(8):1012-24
pubmed: 21258084
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Feb;25(1):223-233
pubmed: 28303473
J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):51-8
pubmed: 16391187
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24
pubmed: 19144937
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jul;45(7):1079-1090
pubmed: 29497801
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):e44-e164
pubmed: 23182125
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1503-16
pubmed: 17387127
J Nucl Med. 2017 Jun;58(6):961-967
pubmed: 27811121
J Nucl Med. 2013 Apr;54(4):549-55
pubmed: 23482666
Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 1;21(15):3301-7
pubmed: 15905277
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb 28;59(9):857-81
pubmed: 22296741
Biom J. 2006 Aug;48(5):745-57
pubmed: 17094340